Read Doc's post again, and then your response. The implication of your comment is that Bush caused the increase in oil prices. Finally, the truth has set you free.Quote from hapaboy:
No, just rank hypocrisy.
Impeachment Hearing Today....Fox News
- Thread starter libertad
- Start date
or move to Canada for the real masochists. can you say FREEZE YOUR ASS OFF!
socialistic azzholes
yea, i want to go thru life in a refrigerator LOL
socialistic azzholes
yea, i want to go thru life in a refrigerator LOL
Oh good grief.Quote from Thunderdog:
Read Doc's post again, and then your response. The implication of your comment is that Bush caused the increase in oil prices. Finally, the truth has set you free.
No, the implication of my comment is that if Doc really believes Bush caused the rise in oil prices for personal profit of him and his cronies, then criticizing Bush while making profit from the very thing he finds to be morally repugnant about Bush's actions is hypocritical. If he's really indignant about what Bush has done, he shouldn't want any part of it.
Canadian logic, LOL!
Nah, you're just projecting. However, there is nothing morally repugnant regardless. For example, an oil trader will trade to his advantage irrespective of his political convictions. (Somewhat similarly, someone like Buffet will pay as little tax as necessary even though he believes the rich are not paying enough. The only way to make a meaningful difference is to change the game.)Quote from hapaboy:
Oh good grief.
No, the implication of my comment is that if Doc really believes Bush caused the rise in oil prices for personal profit of him and his cronies, then criticizing Bush while making profit from the very thing he finds to be morally repugnant about Bush's actions is hypocritical. If he's really indignant about what Bush has done, he shouldn't want any part of it.
Canadian logic, LOL!
Judging by your response, you seem to be harboring a fair amount of shame just beneath the surface. Acknowledgement is the first, and most critical, step. Soon, you will find that the Dark Side no longer even feels like home.
LOL.Quote from Thunderdog:
Nah, you're just projecting. However, there is nothing morally repugnant regardless. For example, an oil trader will trade to his advantage irrespective of his political convictions. (Somewhat similarly, someone like Buffet will pay as little tax as necessary even though he believes the rich are not paying enough. The only way to make a meaningful difference is to change the game.)
Judging by your response, you seem to be harboring a fair amount of shame just beneath the surface. Acknowledgement is the first, and most critical, step. Soon, you will find that the Dark Side no longer even feels like home.
If you are truly disgusted by something, and have a high degree of morality, you would stop trying to make money that way.
Oil traders clearly are not morally repulsed by what they do.
Anyway, your Canadian logic continues to amuse me. Not to mention how you "project" your envy of your southern neighbor.
BS argument, bordering comfortably on the non sequitur. It is not the activity or livelihood itself that is "disgusting." I guess obfuscation comes naturally to you by now, eh?
What about "If you are truly disgusted by something, and have a high degree of morality" don't you understand?Quote from Thunderdog:
BS argument, bordering comfortably on the non sequitur. It is not the activity or livelihood itself that is "disgusting." I guess obfuscation comes naturally to you by now, eh?
You Canadians, always two steps behind...
IF WE WANTED CANADA AS NEXT STATE THERE'S NOT A FREAKING THING THEY COULD DO ABOUT IT LOL
Well, aren't you the poster child for gun control, eh?