Immigration Key Area For Trump

Excerpts below from excellent article warning Trump not to make Nixon's mistake of trying to appease the media and liberals.
**********************

Strategic Deportation

The MSM’s narrative about “mass deportation” was always a red herring. A “deportation force” would be great, but really, it already exists. What’s more important is furthering self-deportation though the kinds of policies we’ve exhaustively documented here at VDARE.com, including mandatory E-Verify, workplace raids, and enforcing laws against hiring illegals.

vargas21.jpg
But at least some deportations are necessary. President Trump needs to tell immigration authorities to deport those arrogant illegals who are appearing on television, speaking at political conventions and even appearing before Congress on Day One.

At the top of the list: Jose Antonio Vargas, an occupier who has spent his entire life trying to deconstruct our nation and identity. No muss, no fuss, no press conference. “Out, out, out!”

The rest will get the message.

  • Birthright citizenship
AnchorBaby1.jpg
Closing the Anchor Baby loophole is the single most important policy change that need to be implemented if America is to be saved. All enforcement mechanisms, even deporting all illegals, are simply delaying the inevitable unless the lie of birthright citizenship is abolished. Both Trump and Vice-President-elect Mike Pence have advocated the abolition of birthright citizenship in the past. However, there was disturbingly little mention of this near the end of the campaign.

According to an analysis by the Daily Caller, there will be another seven million eligible voters because of birthright citizenship by 2032. This will be enough to wipe out the Trump Coalition unless it is headed off right away. [6.8 million: How Birthright Citizenship Is Changing US Elections, by Justin Caruso, November 5, 2016] Trump must act quickly and also ensure any justices appointed to the Supreme Court will correctly interpret the 14th Amendment in regard to this issue.

  • Flip the script on refugees
After initially wobbling, Trump has been solid in opposing the importation of Muslim refugees to the United States. However, even this is ultimately a defensive action—the providing against “preventable evils” that Enoch Powell said was “the supreme function of statesmanship” in his great 1968 immigration speech.

But it’s time to take the offensive. At CPAC in 2013, Donald Trump spoke about accepting high-skilled immigration from European nations. He should now announce the United States is willing to accept only refugees of European descent from a once-Western nation, South Africa. After all, who can say that Afrikaners are not being oppressed by their government, are not at risk for violence, or being discriminated against on a massive scale?

This would send a powerful symbolic message. And, at the very least, we might end up with the abolition of the “refugee” racket—which is just an expedited, subsidized special immigration program for politically-favored groups that makes no sense morally or politically.

Each of these policies contains risk. But power is fleeting and this opportunity will never come again.

It is no exaggeration to say what is at stake is whether the United States of America will continue as a First World country. A defensive strategy will lead to another Nixon Administration. Compromise is with declared enemies is a non-starter. Trump has no choice but to go on the attack.

Peace was never an option.

http://www.vdare.com/articles/nixon...s-no-afrikaner-refugees-yes?content=Committee Chairblob Priebus
 
very interesting. I agree the anchor baby citizenship program must stop. For the americans that already benefited from it. Great. You are as american as anyone. But it should cease to apply to babies born in 2017 and beyond.


I think my wife is an anchor baby. Her parents were here as students from holland. I don't think they were fully naturalized when she was born.

I would enjoy telling her that new legislation passed and the only reason she is American is by marriage. She would be ticked. Oh... I would here about how much income tax she has paid over her lifetime. She would be triggered and she is not easily triggered.

That is (in part) why the legislation should only apply going forward. It would be unfair and I don't think the constitution would allow you to remove citizenship like that any way.
 
Back
Top