Not because I don't like them... just that they don't "deserve" to still be in the running. The refs blew a critical call that likely cost the Browns the win.
The rules on that SUCK! If the initial call had been "touchdown", the play would have been reviewed as routine policy. But because the ref ruled, "fumble through the end zone and therefore touchback", the play wasn't "reviewable". What kind of sense does that make? (If the play had been reviewable, it would have been obvious the ref missed the "helmet hit" foul.)
Instead of the subsequent, "Chief's ball on the 20 from the touchback", should have been "Browns, 1st and goal from the 1".
The rules on that SUCK! If the initial call had been "touchdown", the play would have been reviewed as routine policy. But because the ref ruled, "fumble through the end zone and therefore touchback", the play wasn't "reviewable". What kind of sense does that make? (If the play had been reviewable, it would have been obvious the ref missed the "helmet hit" foul.)
Instead of the subsequent, "Chief's ball on the 20 from the touchback", should have been "Browns, 1st and goal from the 1".
Last edited:
