yes i wish i did it 10 years back.You have a coach?
And you did exactly the opposite of what your coach told you?![]()
my'coach' was Brooks....i read his books
Funny, how in trading and in life, one man's poison is another man's food.
yes i wish i did it 10 years back.You have a coach?
And you did exactly the opposite of what your coach told you?![]()
it took me 10 years to know how far the market will go....and to put proper target.profit target
I understand paduatrader. I definetly understand what you mean. I am noticing in my own trading that scalping is profitable if done right.it works like a dream for me
this what i wanted to do all my life :SCALP.
because i have the time and i need money for daily expenses.Like everyone else
but never in my wildest dreams did i imagine it would take 12 years to achieve
padutrader,it took me 10 years to know how far the market will go....and to put proper target.
not one based on risk reward.
Is not funny,
padutrader,it took me 10 years to know how far the market will go....and to put proper target.
not one based on risk reward.
i always had a great deal of difficulty in putting a target based on the risk you are willing to take.
the target should be based on what the market is doing rather than on your risk.
your risk is personal. i do not think target should be personal or arbitrary or even connected to your risk
I was always flabbergasted when all experts kept insisting to put the target at 2 or 3 or whatever, times risk.
nothing is more absurd.
but happy i cracked the problem.
Like Einstein said 'i am not more intelligent than others but i stay with the problem longer'
i stayed with the problem and cracked it
There are different stop levels. X amount of points. Max amount $ one is willing to risk. Catastrophic SL. SL based on PT desired. Price action SL’s. I prefer PA SL’s. If a trade with a properly placed PA SL is too big of a risk for me then simply best to pass on that trade and wait for another opportunity. This can happen multiple times on high volatility days. I know this sound backwards but BO’s require bigger SL’s. Because if they fail pb’s can be deep and stop you out before reversing back in the direction of your trade. I like to compare say a bull BO on a 5 minute chart with 1 min...15 min..30 min..60 min. A BO of say 3 bars on a 5 min chart can have a pb on the 5 min that looks like the bo is ending but spring over to a 15 minute chart or 30 min and you got a strong bull bar spike that most likely isn’t showing any selling pressure and maybe through just half of the bar time on the larger time frame, with half still to go before the bar closes and from all appearance seems likely to close in the upper end of the bar. I will have to look over my trades today and see if there is an example of some of what I am talking about here. Maybe post a chart or two to illustrate.it took me 10 years to know how far the market will go....and to put proper target.
not one based on risk reward.
i always had a great deal of difficulty in putting a target based on the risk you are willing to take.
the target should be based on what the market is doing rather than on your risk.
your risk is personal. i do not think target should be personal or arbitrary or even connected to your risk
I was always flabbergasted when all experts kept insisting to put the target at 2 or 3 or whatever, times risk.
nothing is more absurd.
Just remember high probability then you probably have to settle for bigger risk or smaller reward or both. Whereas low probability trades can have smaller risks and much larger rewards if they work out. But when they don’t work out loss is smaller.padutrader,
I agree with the risk reward thing. I lean more towards high probability of a win, regardless of risk vs reward.