I’m disappointed with the debate

DTB2 said:
I won't do your research but here's a freebie for you. Next time do it before spouting off.

Oregon was one of only a few states in the nation that had no gestational age limit on abortion, and the only one with no restrictions at all. (simple Wiki search, try it sometime and then dig deeper if you wish)

https://www.doj.state.or.us/oregon-...torney-general/spotlight-reproductive-rights/
More...

i love it.

you make a claim. someone asks for evidence. you provide a link that doesn't support your claim. someone else calls you out on it. you provide a link (presumably after doing some research) and then state "i'm not doing your research for you."

I hear that evangilicals eat placentas and that's why they want abortions banned.
 
smallfil said:
Take note, there is a two minute limit on each candidate to answer questions. Also, the interference of the moderators and their trickery with rapid fire questions, one after another, allowing Kamala Harris to talk with her microphone open when it is President Donald Trump's turn to talk, prevents him from bringing all his points across. That is not counting the lies coming out of the moderators mouths. There is little time to respond because of this sham of a debate. Future debates should be run by moderators chosen from each side, one each. Questions should come from the public and moderators can choose which of the questions to ask the candidates. Otherwise, there should be no debates if you cannot run the debates fairly for both sides. They can just go on the attack ads. Actually, attack ads with the actual candidate stating their positions with videos of what they said is 100,000% more truthful and would educate the US voters more on the candidates, real and true position on the issues. Maybe, future candidates will do just that. Do not know who is running the Trump ads this time out but, the ones I saw seem too timid. A better approach is Kamala Harris stating her positions in the past compared with what she is claiming her positions now. Just stitch those videos. There is plenty to impeach her credibility with the public. Being proven a liar on tv will achieve more than these so called debates. Also, they will remind people each time they see the attack video why one should not vote for Kamala Harris.
More...
You’re not wrong but I would prefer ads that clearly state the candidates intentions over ads that try to tell you what the other candidate wants.
 
long said:
You’re not wrong but I would prefer ads that clearly state the candidates intentions over ads that try to tell you what the other candidate wants.
More...

It is fair that they state what they plan to do but, their positions of the past matter because that would determine their character and truthfulness. Politicians as a whole, make a lot of empty promises and even change positions once, in power. US voters deserve an objective view of what the candidate actually stands for and believes in. Nothing more telling is the candidates speaking and recorded on video in the past. They cannot lie about what they actually said in their past positions. Kamala Harris claimed in the debate that she did not change her positions including, on fracking. However, there are videos where Kamala Harris said she is against fracking in the past.
 
I disappointed that Trump didn't take a Viagra at the start and tell her that if she got too uppety, he'd rape her like he did Ivana.
 
newwurldmn said:
i love it.

you make a claim. someone asks for evidence. you provide a link that doesn't support your claim. someone else calls you out on it. you provide a link (presumably after doing some research) and then state "i'm not doing your research for you."

I hear that evangilicals eat placentas and that's why they want abortions banned.
More...
It was a free starter kit for some of the chuckleheads here who prefer some procedural bullshit instead of actually knowing what the facts are. But, you do you
 
DTB2 said:
It was a free starter kit for some of the chuckleheads here who prefer some procedural bullshit instead of actually knowing what the facts are. But, you do you
More...

When red states block abortions for minor sexual assault survivors so they can virtue signal about being pro life, you are nowhere to be seen to spout facts. But ya, some woman getting late term abortion to save their own lives is procedural bullshit.
 
IMG-20240912-WA0001.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top