I understand. But the states that have no time limit provide the possibility. It’s not an issue that I’m concerned with though. I believe that the federal government shouldn’t be involved with it.
I’m disappointed with the debate
- Thread starter long
- Start date
It's generally referred to as "partial birth" abortion... because sometimes the fetus is killed 1/2 way out or after it's removed from the uterus. Trump calls it "killing the baby after it's already born".
Either way, God help the woman, couple, and family who goes through that.
Last edited:
this logic doesn’t make any sense. the detail of viability matters.
the reason the Supreme Court made the ruling pushing it down to the states is that 3 Supreme Court justices who trump appointed wouldn’t be impeached for perjury just three months ago.
Those are there when mother's life is in danger, are you stupid enough to believe that a woman waits for 8 months to carry out an abortion? You are concerned with bullshit just like your earrings conspiracy, nothing but right wing nonsense. Meanwhile you have no concerns with multiple red state governments forcing rape victims to give birth, some of them are minors.
Take note, there is a two minute limit on each candidate to answer questions. Also, the interference of the moderators and their trickery with rapid fire questions, one after another, allowing Kamala Harris to talk with her microphone open when it is President Donald Trump's turn to talk, prevents him from bringing all his points across. That is not counting the lies coming out of the moderators mouths. There is little time to respond because of this sham of a debate. Future debates should be run by moderators chosen from each side, one each. Questions should come from the public and moderators can choose which of the questions to ask the candidates. Otherwise, there should be no debates if you cannot run the debates fairly for both sides. They can just go on the attack ads. Actually, attack ads with the actual candidate stating their positions with videos of what they said is 100,000% more truthful and would educate the US voters more on the candidates, real and true position on the issues. Maybe, future candidates will do just that. Do not know who is running the Trump ads this time out but, the ones I saw seem too timid. A better approach is Kamala Harris stating her positions in the past compared with what she is claiming her positions now. Just stitch those videos. There is plenty to impeach her credibility with the public. Being proven a liar on tv will achieve more than these so called debates. Also, they will remind people each time they see the attack video why one should not vote for Kamala Harris.
Last edited:
I won't do your research but here's a freebie for you. Next time do it before spouting off.
Oregon was one of only a few states in the nation that had no gestational age limit on abortion, and the only one with no restrictions at all. (simple Wiki search, try it sometime and then dig deeper if you wish)
https://www.doj.state.or.us/oregon-...torney-general/spotlight-reproductive-rights/
every year?
yes. Every year.
some women do it because they get tax credits and more welfare which is why we have to get rid of welfare for the poor and give large companies more tax breaks.
slavery is the best solution.