Quote from swtrader:
you're entitled to your opinion, but you're quoting platitudes from more ordinary markets
this was a CRASH, with every 'recovering' sector running on unsustainable subsidies - 2 trillion borrowed so far. and we have 1.8 trillion a year budget deficit. The fundamental and technical case is against a new bull market
This was/is the largest uninterrupted rally since the great depression - since 1996, the 20 month moving average has defined the trend
i've held my fire on any top calling this entire run - not once have i said we were until 2 weeks ago, i started that thread in the first post here, that thus far, is holding
Quote from FB123:
As I said in your other thread, I wouldn't be surprised if you were right... but it's a bit early right now to calling it so definitively. They can still turn on the spigots any time they want, so if I see a lot of people getting bearish like they were in July, I'd be pretty careful. This is not a normal market, and normal rules do not apply. I definitely wouldn't be going long here right now though...
Quote from lexcorp:
all of these 'the top is in' threads are becoming almost embarassing now, as the market proves each one wrong in turn, but i wish you all the best!!
Quote from swtrader:
i dont think i've ever done one before
i am at least, attempting to put forth a case with some analysis, be it right or wrong
at a number of places there are extraordinary technical allignment
Quote from swtrader:
as i said in another post, i think the easy guess is a drop to the 200 month moving avg at spx 1019 to test support, from there it';s anyone's guess
after that it could ping pong between the 200 and the now lower 20 month (about 1042)
"but it's a bit early right now to calling it so definitively"
I put forth the hypothesis 2 weeks ago, and now i'm calling it
i'm just avoiding the wishy washy bullshit of covering the scerios of it not being correct as an alternate prediction, as elliot wavers are notrious for
Quote from FB123:
I wouldn't be surprised to see a trading range for a while either... but not sure that I would qualify that as "the" top. You can't call a decline to 1019 "the" top. To me, "the" top would be a significant clawback of the gains we have seen since March 6th... you are predicting nothing more than a 12% retracement of that move from 666 to 1075. That is not "the" top, it is just a retracement, if it happens.