I'm 21 years old, couldn't enter University, planning to trade full-time.

I disagree. Some very smart fund guys are getting clobbered this year. A lot of these "highly educated guys" have enjoyed a nice slow bull market. Now they are being tested and not doing so great.

Also it wasn't greed that did those guys in at LTCM, it was zero risk management skills. Not having the ability to admit when wrong.

But I am talking more about the guys I know at big prop desks and traders at hedge funds that I know of. Not the Jim Simons of the world.

Smarts doesn't guarantee success but it will open the right doors.
 
If you are not educated in higher math, computers, or stats-- the ONLY way to make it is to joun a prop firm that will provide leverage and teach edges. If you are educated, you can join hedge funds , institutions, etc and learn under a mentor if they think u are a smart cookie.

With the prop firm u may have to out up first loss capital, but its way smarter than the stupid DIY 10,000 hour way -- which just ends up making you poor and desperate friendless and angry. unless u get lucky.

EVERY verified succesful trader on elite worked for a firm first or still did. No one DIYd with evidence-- lots of keyboard cowboys pretenders and stealth vendors trying to convince you otherwise but after 13 years on this forum, i have never seen evidence of a non firm trained trader ever being succesful.

Only exception would be sle and rally mode. Otherwise I think you are basically right.
 
Smarts doesn't guarantee success but it will open the right doors.

I agree it definitely helps getting interviews and getting looked at. Especially at hedge funds. No doubt. My point is though when it comes to being a successful trader I don't think education holds much weight in determining success. One of the biggest /most successful traders I am friends with didn't even go to college. I went to a good school, but honestly, the things I learned in school are useless in the world of trading.
 
Eventually once I have about 100k I will trade full-time. (assuming my trading is successful)

Usually math is a pretty important skill in the trading world. If you think you can trade full time on an account size of just 100k, I don't think you've run the numbers and perhaps don't have the basic math skills required for this business.

Let's say you study your ass off and you really do build trading systems that return 30% a year, every single year consistently like clock work. (this would put you among some of the worlds elites)

30% on 100k is of course 30k profit right? Take out 30% taxes, so you're left with 21k. Now I don't know about you, but 21k doesn't get me and the family through March let alone the whole calendar year.


Obviously it varies based on rate of return, tax rates, how much you're looking to pull out of your fund every year to live on, but a good general rule would be if you don't have 500k at least, you can't quit your job and trade full time. A million or two is closer to realistic on a reasonable rate of return.

Even 500k making 30% annually like clockwork is just 100k after tax profit. Not terrible, of course a family can get by on that pretty easily, but it's hardly living the high life.

And of course I hope I don't have to mention why it's damn near unheard of for people to make 30% annually like clockwork for a lifetime. A few years sure, maybe even 5-10 years. But your whole life, year in, year out, come on... :)
 
Last edited:
I understand what you mean, however I feel that I am willing to study about investing/trading because firstly, it is my passion. Secondly, I have more motivation to get good at investing/trading as I can directly get richer if I have the skills. Compare this to knowing some organic chemistry reactions or how to synthesize a substance into an ester in 3 steps - how would knowing those help me get richer? Besides that, I think even if I do get a degree and get a office job, so what? I'll still be middle-income, struggling to pay off bills and debts. The only way I can get rich is by setting up my own business or investing/trading, so I might as well do it now and achieve my dream of becoming a millionaire.

You are viewing the basic chemistry in the wrong way imo. Its just a test to see if you can stick with it and ultimately get a qualification that increases your earnings power. We are talking about a basic pre degree level here. The smart thing to do is complete a degree education AND learn about trading on the journey.
 
Usually math is a pretty important skill in the trading world. If you think you can trade full time on an account size of just 100k, I don't think you've run the numbers and perhaps don't have the basic math skills required for this business.

Let's say you study your ass off and you really do build trading systems that return 30% a year, every single year consistently like clock work. (this would put you among some of the worlds elites)

30% on 100k is of course 30k profit right? Take out 30% taxes, so you're left with 21k. Now I don't know about you, but 21k doesn't get me and the family through March let alone the whole calendar year.


Obviously it varies based on rate of return, tax rates, how much you're looking to pull out of your fund every year to live on, but a good general rule would be if you don't have 500k at least, you can't quit your job and trade full time. A million or two is closer to realistic on a reasonable rate of return.

Even 500k making 30% annually like clockwork is just 100k after tax profit. Not terrible, of course a family can get by on that pretty easily, but it's hardly living the high life.

And of course I hope I don't have to mention why it's damn near unheard of for people to make 30% annually like clockwork for a lifetime. A few years sure, maybe even 5-10 years. But your whole life, year in, year out, come on... :)

I'm aiming for way more than just 30% yearly return.
 
I'm aiming for way more than just 30% yearly return.
In a typical bullish year, S&P averages about 10% annually. Do you truly think you, as an amateur trader, can beat the index by 3 fold? You need to be humble or the market will humble you in the end.
 
In a typical bullish year, S&P averages about 10% annually. Do you truly think you, as an amateur trader, can beat the index by 3 fold? You need to be humble or the market will humble you in the end.

Dan Zanger managed to get 23000% return on his investment in 2 years. Why not?
 
Back
Top