Illegals Access Welfare At High Rates Through Anchor Babies

There was some dispute about a claim I made that the illegals access welfare at rates far above the legal population. Low information voters will likely be astonished to learn that illegals can access welfare at all, but they can and do.

This article goes into it. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/422921/birthright-citizenship-economic-costs-incentives

Among the facts presented, the article notes that:

"Reporting that finding, the Pew Research Center noted that, while illegal immigrants make up about 4 percent of the adult population, “because they have high birthrates, their children make up a much larger share of both the newborn population (8 percent) and the child population (7 percent) in this country.” The cost of this is not negligible. Inflation-adjusted figures from the U.S. Department of Agriculture projected that a child born in 2013 would cost his parents $304,480 from birth to his eighteenth birthday. Given that illegal-alien households are normally low-income households (three out of five illegal aliens and their U.S.-born children live at or near the poverty line), one would expect that a significant portion of that cost will fall on the government. And that’s exactly what‘s happening. According to CIS, 71 percent of illegal-alien headed households with children received some sort of welfare in 2009, compared with 39 percent of native-headed houses with children. Illegal immigrants generally access welfare programs through their U.S.-born children, to whom government assistance is guaranteed. Additionally, U.S.-born children of illegal aliens are entitled to American public schools, health care, and more, even though illegal-alien households rarely pay taxes."

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/422921/birthright-citizenship-economic-costs-incentives
 
The article reported on a ten year old, ie before illegal immigration became a core principle of both parties, study:

The short-term cost of “anchor babies” was revealed a decade ago in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons. “‘Anchor babies’ born to illegal aliens instantly qualify as citizens for welfare benefits and have caused enormous rises in Medicaid costs and stipends under Supplemental Security Income and Disability Income,” wrote medical attorney Madeleine Pelner Cosman. She noted the increasingly costly situation in California: In 2003 in Stockton, California, 70 percent of the 2,300 babies born in San Joaquin General Hospital’s maternity ward were anchor babies, and 45 percent of Stockton children under age six are Latino (up from 30 percent in 1993). In 1994, 74,987 anchor babies in California hospital maternity units cost $215 million and constituted 36 percent of all Medi-Cal [California’s Medicaid program] births. Now [2005] they account for substantially more than half.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/422921/birthright-citizenship-economic-costs-incentives
 
You may think none of this affects you, but health care rationing is inevitable under obamacare or any form of socialized medicine. Politicians who support open borders and amnesty to gain new voters are not likely to deny them health care in favor of elderly white people who vote republican. You or your parents should get ready to be told that you just can't get that MRI or hip replacement you need. The money was spent on illegals and their large families, even though they never contributed a dime to medicare or social security or shelled out for hideously expensive obamacare insurance.
 
... You or your parents should get ready to be told that you just can't get that MRI or hip replacement you need. The money was spent on illegals and their large families, even though they never contributed a dime to medicare or social security or shelled out for hideously expensive obamacare insurance.

What? You mean I can't get my life-saving heart valve replacemet... because the money for it was spent on illegals?

Once that reality soaks in, perhaps then we'll get the revolution we need to unburden ourselves from illegal parasites!
 
I worked on a state IT project about 8 years back (one of my few non-banking projects). It was a state system that covered enrollment of low income children for free state medical care. Over half the entries in the system had no social security numbers for the parents - meaning the parents were not legal residents of the U.S. Keep in mind the mothers also get free pre-birth maternity care and the birth is also paid for.

Now tell me this does not cost a tremendous amount of money out of the taxpayers pockets.
 
I worked on a state IT project about 8 years back (one of my few non-banking projects). It was a state system that covered enrollment of low income children for free state medical care. Over half the entries in the system had no social security numbers for the parents - meaning the parents were not legal residents of the U.S. Keep in mind the mothers also get free pre-birth maternity care and the birth is also paid for.

Now tell me this does not cost a tremendous amount of money out of the taxpayers pockets.

Of course it's a taxpayer burden... doesn't matter so long as it supports the DemoCrap Socialist agenda.
 
like the man (from Texas) said, "If you deny these children an education you just don't have a heart."

Yeah, that really resonated with voters...NOT.

No one was denying them an education. Most if not all of them had already been treated to a free public school education, courtesy of taxpayers. The dispute was about favoring them over legal citizens of other states by giving them in state tuition to state universities.

Perry, and most of the other candidates of both parties, was in favor of discriminating against legal citizens in favor of illegals. I can't swallow that myself.
 
Yeah, that really resonated with voters...NOT.

No one was denying them an education. Most if not all of them had already been treated to a free public school education, courtesy of taxpayers. The dispute was about favoring them over legal citizens of other states by giving them in state tuition to state universities.

Perry, and most of the other candidates of both parties, was in favor of discriminating against legal citizens in favor of illegals. I can't swallow that myself.
I don't think any taxpayer should pay for a godamned public education (although mine was very good and it is still good out in the all white suburbs. Best in the world compared to all other countries. Nobody else even comes close.) But as a taxpayer I would gladly pay for an education voucher for any young person that really wants to learn.
 
I don't think any taxpayer should pay for a godamned public education (although mine was very good and it is still good out in the all white suburbs. Best in the world compared to all other countries. Nobody else even comes close.) But as a taxpayer I would gladly pay for an education voucher for any young person that really wants to learn.
Well, since you'd be willing to pay for that voucher I guess I could opt out of paying!
 
Back
Top