the simple fact is, when you factor in the social cost of each additional immgrant from mexico, their cost to the infrastructure (schools, roads, etc) social services (police, fire, courts, prisons etc) exceeds the value of their work
to 'fill a job', then the public must *subsidize the employer*, because the employer 'cant afford to pay more'
this public subsidy, in a budget deficit situation, is paid for with more debt
the 'job' in fact, is an economic activitity that DESTROYS wealth, rather than creates it - why does someone have a G-d given right to emply at a level that destroys wealth overall?
I needed to fill up my car this weekend. I wanted to pay $2 per gallon, like I had earlier this year. Was there a shortage of gasoline, or merely a shortage of gasoline at $2?
to 'fill a job', then the public must *subsidize the employer*, because the employer 'cant afford to pay more'
this public subsidy, in a budget deficit situation, is paid for with more debt
the 'job' in fact, is an economic activitity that DESTROYS wealth, rather than creates it - why does someone have a G-d given right to emply at a level that destroys wealth overall?
I needed to fill up my car this weekend. I wanted to pay $2 per gallon, like I had earlier this year. Was there a shortage of gasoline, or merely a shortage of gasoline at $2?