If You Were Taken Aback by Obama

You're ignorance of

uh-huh-o.gif
 
last time you said that you revealed your ignorance of the difference between a plaintiff in a trial action and petitioner in an appellate action.

you reveal your ignorance again.


Jem, you are a lawyer, right? You're ignorance of both the law, and everyday logic astounds me.
 
when actors took the 5th in front of congress (McCarthy hearings) hollywood blacklisted them.
everyone with a brain knows that there is a strong chance you are guilty of something or you are protecting a guilty person when you take the 5th.

Innocent people rarely have to take the fifth.

for instance...

Did you scrutinize tea party applications more thoroughly than others?
Did you tell anyone to place greater attention or focus on tea party applications?

Potential answers: no, yes or take the fifth.
Would you take the fifth if you could honestly answer no?
The vast majority of people would answer no if they could.

so you are either guilty or if you answered it might look like you could be guilty. or maybe your are guilty but you have an excuse.

In politics when your administration or your appointees take the 5th there is very likely corruption.
Of course the leftist loons will try to spin the crap out of it.
But everybody presumes those taking the 5th are guilty or covering for someone who is.
Do you guys presume the people in Christies administration are taking the 5th for the fun of it.

guys like piezoe have to stop with the ignorant drone spin and start thinking.




Jem . . . i think Stu would disagree with the above statement.
 
Back
Top