If you want to fail as a trader, study TA

Status
Not open for further replies.
BTW, elliot waves are rubbish, just in case anyone was thinking of going off and studying them after reading about wave 8:eek: :D

GOD FORBID, we will have gann mentioned next, and who knows WHO else:D

TE
 
Quote from Traduk:

I feel sure that you could re-compile the data I use and whatever I display them as to something completely different that had a totally different meaning.

When I use probably one of the most accurate data providers available and show data in 6 different formats, why would I wish to change something that works for something that by default wouldn't?.

If your point is that underlying market dynamics rules then I am in total agreement and it doesn't matter what shows it providing something does.

Big Outside Bar is it TE?

Please show us the BOB in the BDX chart:confused:

TE
 
T.E.,

With BDX your lines fantastically delineated both areas of sideways action. Without knowing how those lines are arrived at a four year old could click\click and place lines that would look equally as good.

You have never made a call in advance of any move and any charts shown are always not only after the fact but as usual devoid of detail.

Why do you keep showing BDX. It is\was a $75 stock that has moved a huge $3 and spends most of its time going sideways in moves that would drive a daytrader to the point of losing the will to live. It is a useless candidate for daytrading and runs totally contrary to your often mentioned time=money.

There are an awful lot of things that a trader would have done if as you have done, aim to seek an audience. It is nearly three months since you appeared in a self proclaimed fanfare and in the interim you have done nothing to even hint at worthiness for your handle.
 
Quote from The Expert:

What were the low risk entries for BDX, and WHY:confused:

TE

I see no good entries, probably because I don't have a clue what to look for.

Jumping in at the open would have been great if you were psychic and put a random stop loss in since there was really no point of reference as to where to put one.

I have no idea what those horizontal lines are. Tried correlating them to something, but it's just not happening.
 
Re. horizontal lines, I'd hazard they're just plain and simple consolidation ranges.

Actually this thread is getting pretty big now, including the original thread at the site TE doesn't like to mention. It would be nice to get down to some substance for once.

Good to hear from you Traduk...

TE, I'm going to take a guess at your method:
Range break outs based on accumulation / distribution... so, pretty much Wyckoff...
Do I get a silver star?
 
Quote from ProfLogic:

Or to expand . . .

TA limitations are sometimes self inflicted. When analyzing a variable environment, expect varying results. When you analyze a fixed environment, expect stable results.

High volatility, news events or some idiot potentially selling a billion shares of PG won't trump a fixed environment but it WILL drive a variable environment crazy. The cat on the keyboard is the exception though. That is why you ship the cat off to a neighbor with a big dog if it messes with your trading.

It is the responsibility of any practitioner to be fully aware of all of the intricacies and idiosyncrasies in using TA but that isn't the case. Traders, for the most part, become familiar with some of the rules, try to play the game and lose because they didn't bother to learn ALL of the rules.

Then, even worse, those traders start threads, recite riddles and try to cover over the fact they never had the patience to learn all of the rules in the first place. Then, because misery loves company, people migrate to these posters because they think they know something they don't. They do, they know they didn't learn all of the rules. They ridicule those they took the vast amount of time needed to break the environment down to learn all of the rules as well.

Bottom line guys . . . if you lay your charts out randomly, you will get random results. If you take the time to learn how to set up your charts, eliminating the random nature of their creation, then when you create a chart, WHATEVER analysis you apply to it will be hugely more accurate and hugely more consistent.

Lets see how many traders will actually apply this.:)
 
Look at BDX today, notice anything

I believe the most noticeable fact is: yesterday late it fell out the earlier range, a new range.

Let's assume this last range of .25 to be considered the risk. The price is entering uncharted territory. However this is partially true. I see demand at € 73.66 (closing price) on weekly chart. Demand level Intraday might be different. Cannot see however.

Maybe the following is not relevant: I noticed the opposite a few times, I mean out of range to the upside at he end of the day. Other stocks at the end of day. Kind of pointing the possible direction for the next day?
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

Lets see how many traders will actually apply this.:)

I assume the Prof is recommending a fixed method or system of analysis.

When I wait for my regular set ups I tend to do well, whereas if I start taking trades (usually out of boredom) based on other analysis methods (you could say randomly) I tend to not do so well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top