Quote from Big Outside Bar:
Hmmmmm, big outside blow offs...is that even legal?
Whatever you choose to call them they indicate the same underlying market dynamics.
But the question is, why use bars at all? Show me a sequence of bars on your chart, I'll change your baseline period or offset and show you a totally different sequence of bars.
Candlesticks are only any good for killing Colonel Mustard. Real generals use much more effective weapons.
Quote from DionysusToast:
Good day all. Not trading today. I have other things on my mind currently - like being on the wrong end of a grenade or bullet. Having to keep your head down does not make for a happy trading finger.
So - let me steer for a second...
First - BOB - Blow Out Bottom/Blow Out Bar ???
Second - ze generals. I found the generals book pretty interesting 'cept it's not a book - it appears it's the accompanying documentation to a web seminar - all 500+ pages of it. I can only hope for those present that it was more than one sitting.
It starts off looking a lot like a swing trading methodolody. It talks of a certain segment of the trading community with deep pockets that measure themselves in comparison to the performance of the S&P500. Anyone that's brought a mutual fund knows this makes sense. It also says that these people can't beat the performance by investing in the S&P500 so they need to be selective. OK - also makes sense.
There is talk of these people getting into certain stocks and pushing them for a return. We know TA traders will hump (sic) on a trend, so this also makes sense. There is talk of relative strength too.
Then it jumps into day trading setups and I have to admit it seemed like a bit of a quantum leap to me and I can't help but think there must be something in between. I can understand the concept that certain groups will be investing in stocks and that in this case you can argue that for a period these stocks may rise. On any one day though, I find it hard to see how this is of benefit more than going into an earnings stock for a day trade.
If I look at relative strength on the S&P500, it seem to me that more is not better. I have a strength measure that largely agrees with RSI but is less granular - it gives me a number between -10 to +10. I have seen that those that hit the heady numbers like 7 onwards are actually pretty much done and that those with lower strength, that are just going actually make more sense.
So - I have 2 things I don't understand when looking at this literature....
1 - How do we leap from what 'ze generals' are jumping into on a 'macro' level into any sot of day trading action plan at a 'micro' level ?
2 - How do we use a measure of relative strength when it appears that those with more strength appear to be cooked and ready to serve (apple turnover) ?
Note - spreadsheet of S&P500 with current strengths & daily ranges attached.
