Quote from fortydraws:
I am posting a copy of the daily chart of the Nasdaq 100 index. I placed the regression channel I had mentioned above on the index, striking the upper line from the 5/22 high to the 6/17 high (mistakenly noted as the 6/19 high on the chart) and extending it forward in time.
While I use supply/demand lines, and I use trendlines, at least in my head, when I am watching hinges and springboards and rectangles, I will be more interested in whether price is trading above Friday's high or below it, and how it is behaving wherever it may find itself, than I am with that regression channel.
I have a question for you DbPhoenix: Being a stock guy, I review the daily charts of the indexes and I have used those to establish my reading of the current intermediate trend. And being a stock guy for the last year, I have not paid any mind to the daily charts of the futures. As I embark on this futures trading endeavor, do you suggest I pay attention to the futures daily to the exclusion of the indexes themselves, or what?
Thanks for letting me butt into another of your threads!
First, a regression channel is not a trend channel. It shows a line to which price will regress after one connects the highest high to the lowest low -- or vice-versa -- within a given timeframe. But it will not define a trend channel properly, particularly with regard to overbought/oversold excursions outside the channel. I suggest plotting regression channels to those who have no idea how to determine trend, much less how to distinguish between up and down without plotting an indicator, but they are no substitute. See below the chart I posted earlier:
As for the Big Picture, it needs to be bigger. Below are the NDX and NQ.
Granted the daytrader may wonder why on earth he has to look at a multi-year chart if he's trading a 1m bar interval. The reason, of course, is that whatever trend he's looking at -- even if it's only an hour or so, assuming he's looking at anything that occurred before the open, which many traders aren't -- is bound by the trend or trends within which it resides. Thus if one wants to know the line of least resistance, much less where price can be expected to go both to the upside and the down, he needs to look at the context. Otherwise, he will have no idea what to do when the market opens, and one needn't look far for many examples of traders who fit that particular bill.
It's easy to slip into the micro frame of mind. But allowing oneself to do so means that one will not only fail to profit from whatever trends he lucks into during the day but will more likely find himself trading countertrend again and again. Knowing the macro will help him stay tuned into the general trend and follow the line of least resistance.
As for whether you should focus on the charts of the futures vs the charts of the indices, I suggest you focus on the charts of whatever it is you're trading. The NDX and NQ, for example, lagged the Naz for months before they decided to play catchup in April. What good would it have done to track the Naz for so long, even if one had had the patience to do so? And when it came right down to it, tracking the index wouldn't have mattered anyway to catching the nearly four-week upmove in the NQ from 2780 to 3050, as I showed in the "straight line" thread at TL.
Therefore, considering the general difficulties that traders have with focus, I suggest broadening one's view to a wider timeframe with regard to the particular instrument being traded rather than "broadening" one's view to several instruments in a very narrow timeframe.