In Depressions people die from hunger, I still haven't seen mass starvation around my hood. I can see depression in Somalia, North Korea, in war torn nations; not the US.
So we all have to be riding around on horses, and lining up at soup kitchens before someone officially declares a 'depression'? Key metrics such as the stock market (down 80% since 2000 when measured the same way as in the previous depression, ie: against commodity-backed currency), unemployment (U-6 = 20%, which is similar to the unemployment rate of the GD), housing price declines, etc. all show that the collapse began back in 2000 and has continued unabated.
Even during the first Great Depression, there were certain sectors that were vibrant. For instance, the gold sector absolutely boomed during the Great Depression, because, gold was money back then. In the modern "Great Depression", the money sector boomed because money (ie: federal reserve notes) is considered money nowadays. But the rest of the economy sucked in the 1930s, as it did 2000-2009.
To someone who worked in the gold sector in the 1930s -- the mere talk of the economy being in a 'depression' would have been blasphemy, just like trader6666's comments. The 2000's financial sector is essentially the equivilant of the 1930s gold sector in terms of its role in the economy.
People should work in jobs that they are proficient at (ideal situation) however (reality) don't provide them that CHANCE. Hence people should work whatever jobs they can get, not because of communism or whatever ~ism you want to put in. But simply to provide for their loved ones and family. Because their parents/kids are suffering 2x as bad.
But a 26-year-old college grad who takes a clerk job, is just taking the job away from someone who is better qualified to be a 'clerk', and taking himself out of the market for jobs that are more suitable. That's why I said "communism" -- communist economies collapse not because they lack people, and not because people aren't working, but rather, it is because the people are working at the
wrong jobs, and aren't making efficient use of human and physical capital.
For instance, I suck at sewing. My girlfriend sucks at computers. Hence, in the household, I do all the computer stuff, and she does all the sewing. But if we equally split the sewing duties and the computer duties, the cumulative sum of our efforts would be less than they would be if we each did what we exceled at.