Quote from Ricter:
So... electronic money would represent paper money which would represent the tangible asset which would represent something with inherent value??
Check out the link earlier with the free book "What Has the Govt Done to Our Money ? " by Murray N. Rothbard
And also you might want to check out that long post of mine earlier in this thread.
Boiling things down - - - real money is a commodity used as a medium of exchange. (I used the example of using butter, so you could trade it for shoes and other goods.) Over time, it was found that the best form of medium of exchange were the precious metals gold and silver. They have intrinsic value for jewelry and ornament, and also have value in filling the role as a medium of exchange(thus permitting trade beyond just inefficient barter). - - - In the past it was known that Gold IS money. It was a valued commodity that was traded according to weight. And, various money units throughout the world, were nothing more than various names for particular quantities of these metals. Thus, a 'dollar' Was 1/20 ounce of gold. A British 'pound' Was 1 pound of silver.
Kings have an unquenchable appetite for money to finance their various ventures and foreign adventures. After a time, they got their citizens to buy into the idea that it was the Names rather than the quantity of precious metal that was important. Periodically they had people turn in their gold and silver coins so that they could mint a new coin, (say with the new monarch who took over from his recently deceased father). The new king would cut the quantity of gold from the coin, either mixing it with another metal or just making the coins smaller. The citizens got the same number of Named units back ('pounds', 'shillings', 'marks', or whatever) but they got cheated out of their real precious metal money. The king then went ahead and used the precious metal he stole to mint up more money. (Quite a trick, huh ?) - - - Well people aren't dumb. They figured out that they were being cheated. A 'law' of economics says that people will hold on to the good full value money, and use the cheap stuff. They may not even accept the watered down money at all. - - So, the king would make it a law that citizens had to do so under severe penalty (and that could get damned serious in those days). - - - -
This is a long reply - - - bottomline is that gold and silver, through the test of the centuries Is real money (the valued medium of exchange that allows more than just inefficient barter). It can't just be 'printed up' so it can't be easily manipulated. - - - Your Yukon buddy wouldnt 'print' money; he would be producing it. Its damned hard work, and not easy to do at all. That's one reason it has real value. - - If he is particularly well heeled or has a big investor, I suppose he could mint his own coins. But this was done in order to provide convenient uniform units of precious metals so that people didn't have to weigh each quantity. There were gold coins minted in various places in Europe that were so regarded for their uniformity and purity that they served as money throughout large regions over many years. Just check out the Italian gold Florin -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florin_(Italian_coin) You'll need to go down the 'florin' list till you see the Italian version first minted in the 1500s.
- - Regards, - -
P.S. - - since we have been raised in a funny money fiat paper world, these ideas - - well known through thousands of years, aren't readily apparent right away. As a matter of fact, it could very well 'blow your mind' when you dive into this. Fascinating stuff. Again at
www.mises.org you will find anything you'd like to know on this subject in written, audio, and video formats - - and for free.