All our presidents are one-percenters, it's a wash with the public.
That reasoning didn't help Romney.
All our presidents are one-percenters, it's a wash with the public.
That reasoning didn't help Romney.
No, he became too overt about it. But, in 2012 his wealth we being held up by some as proof of his fitness for the presidency.
He became to overt about it? You said yourself he was recorded unknowingly from a private dinner.
Why not admit it for what it was? The media becoming too "overt" about it.
No, he became too overt about it. But, in 2012 his wealth we being held up by some as proof of his fitness for the presidency.
As you wish. His personal view became known and the public didn't like it. We live in a media intensive time. Everyone has a recording device in their pocket now.
I'm not going to blame the media for everything any more than I'm going to blame Bush.
Of course you won't blame the media. They support the left openly. Romney's personal view is probably no different than Hillary's. But the media will probably give her a pass where it jumped on him. That's the whole point of this thread.
''We really thought we were going to win this'' he said (the Presidency) as tears swelled up his eyes.
We'll be sure of that after Hillary makes a statement like his about the general public. And it probably needs to be "caught" on tape, like his, to give it the same gravity. Until then, we'll have to speculate.
One could argue, though, that rep failure to effectively take the reins of media is (partial) proof of their unfitness to lead.
Thank you for answering my original question (though you obviously were trying hard not to - as usual) that these statements about being "broke" because she couldn't afford "houses" and stuff will continue to be viewed by the left as "not the same thing" as Romney being out of touch from the average Americans because of his wealth.