Quote from GermanTrader:
gnome, you are much smarter than that, and I assume you said that for the sake of conversation. I'll bite.
Lending leverage works well for the banker's profit until the borrowers cash out more money than there is in the vault. I only wish I could use the same theory with time, and sell 64 hours per day when I only have 8!

Quote from gnome:
Well, yes I am smarter than that... and it was a rhetorical question.
But if the banks are THAT important (and they are) the regulators should make sure they do solid business practices... that is, qualified borrowers, properly underwritten loans and terms, conservative capital requirements... that way the likelihood of their getting into this kind of mess would be minimized.
What has anyone learned? RTC in the late 80's, LTCM in late 90's, now THIS! All because of banks' (and politico's) greed and overleverage.
Don't we EVER glean anything from history*? And such recent history at that!
*Another rhetorical question... unless of course the plan all along was "Go ahead and lever your brains out. If it all blows up, the taxpayer will be tapped to foot the bill when necessary."....![]()
Quote from GermanTrader:
If you mean "we" the voting citizens, no, we never learn.
Quote from gnome:
I was thinking of the Legislature and bank regulators... THEY are the ones who should set limits on how risky of practices banks can be engaged in and how much leverage... if we taxpayers are going to be ultimately liable for their mistakes.
Quote from gnome:
I'm quite sure that not 1/100 of us understand that...![]()
Quote from GermanTrader:
I hold the unpopular view that banks should have zero accountability to/control by government (laissez faire, meaning an educated public not too busy to actually READ), but all accountability to their depositors (read: tighter credit, more savings, lower interest rates, competition), that the free market should determine which bank dies and which grows,