Identity Politics: Priority #1 with Democrats.

[UsualName]

That is how democrats argue....
The drones go from from bullshit to ad homs.

I’m sorry but you are moronic. You’re the guy that argues democrats “abandoned whites.” What does that mean? What democrat policy “abandons whites.” That’s a baseless claim.

I’m a white guy, I don’t feel abandoned at all. I feel like the democrats offer governmental stability, a sane economic philosophy, and a willingness to address tough issues like student debt, retirement and healthcare - and this is the BIG point - based on facts.

So please, educated me with your supposed PhD from an accredited clown school on how the democrats have “abandoned whites.”

 

[destriero]

Dumbshit, the parenthetical is obvious... and it needs to be included in the sentence.

 

[constitutionman]

I guarantee you do not hold a higher degree from an accredited US institution than I.

Trump University is not an accredited school, douchebag. also if an ass carries a buncha books, doesn't mean that ass is any smart.

 

[TJustice]

wow what a bunch of bullshit you just slung. I take it you did not understand or could not read the quotes I presented from the Washington post...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-the-nation-got-there/?utm_term=.22613ea8ecb3

To repeat the Washington Post article that stated the democrats courted the non white voters... and whites perceived the party to be moving away from them.

but... I will add to this... because you argument was so obnoxiously douchey...

You don't even need a college education to understand how left the democrats have moved.
You can read Kennedy inauguration speech.

Or you can see all the you tube clips of the democrats being against immigration because they used to care about jobs and wages for Americans.

On issue after issue you party changed. You used to be against big govt and you were pro liberty. You all were once very pro first amendment now your thought leaders question it.

I’m sorry but you are moronic. You’re the guy that argues democrats “abandoned whites.” What does that mean? What democrat policy “abandons whites.” That’s a baseless claim.

I’m a white guy, I don’t feel abandoned at all. I feel like the democrats offer governmental stability, a sane economic philosophy, and a willingness to address tough issues like student debt, retirement and healthcare - and this is the BIG point - based on facts.

So please, educated me with your supposed PhD from an accredited clown school on how the democrats have “abandoned whites.”

 

[CaptainObvious]

A women's march in California has been canceled because it was going to be "overwhelmingly white"

A women’s march planned for January 2019 in Humboldt County, California has officially been cancelled after organizers concluded that the event would be “overwhelmingly” white and would therefore not adequately represent the needs of the community.


So lets get this straight. A "women's" march was overwhelmingly white and therefore would not adequately represent the needs of the community. Errrr, was it a women's march or a needs of the community march? Further, if it was a "needs of the community march" then the participants being overwhelmingly white is a perfect representation of the community.

The racial makeup of the county was 84.7% White, 0.9% Black or African American, 5.7% Native American, 1.7% Asian, 0.2% Pacific Islander, 2.5% from other races, and 4.4% from two or more races. In 2017, 11.7% of the population were Hispanic or Latino according to the United States Census Bureau.

Once again we see the abject stupidity of leftist logic regardless of which way you break it down.

 

[TJustice]

to the pretentious and wrong guy with the boat name.


Go read some of the grammar sites.... as I just did.
They either say you are wrong...or that in fairly recent times your usage is now also allowed. (your usage is subject to debate)

Multiple sites also state the way to check for correct usage is to put the implied verb (in this case the infinitive) back into the sentence and check to see if it still is correct. So you were dead ass wrong about the word needing to be included in the sentence.

 

[destriero]

Dear Dumbshit,

You are, again, missing the point. You need to end the sentence to avoid the (implicit) parenthetical. See?

IOW, your sentence was a failure of syntax.

You're literally too dumb to insult. Grad degrees, eh?

 

[TJustice]

your correction stated
"than me"

What you have been writing since than is bullshit to cover up for your error.

"Than me" is a debated form
"Than I" is the universally accepted form.

...
By the way this is an anonymous internet forum...you are at best a priggish fool for attempting to correct grammar. Because I clearly don't give a shit about it...here. I am just pointing out your correction was ironically incorrect.

 

[Cuddles]

A women's march in California has been canceled because it was going to be "overwhelmingly white"

A women’s march planned for January 2019 in Humboldt County, California has officially been cancelled after organizers concluded that the event would be “overwhelmingly” white and would therefore not adequately represent the needs of the community.


So lets get this straight. A "women's" march was overwhelmingly white and therefore would not adequately represent the needs of the community. Errrr, was it a women's march or a needs of the community march? Further, if it was a "needs of the community march" then the participants being overwhelmingly white is a perfect representation of the community.

The racial makeup of the county was 84.7% White, 0.9% Black or African American, 5.7% Native American, 1.7% Asian, 0.2% Pacific Islander, 2.5% from other races, and 4.4% from two or more races. In 2017, 11.7% of the population were Hispanic or Latino according to the United States Census Bureau.

Once again we see the abject stupidity of leftist logic regardless of which way you break it down.

Wait, what, people that demand one check their privilege not being hypocrites and actually checking their privilege?

So you're saying if the demonstration moved forward, the right would not call them out for their all-white make up?

 

[UsualName]

wow what a bunch of bullshit you just slung. I take it you did not understand or could not read the quotes I presented from the Washington post...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-the-nation-got-there/?utm_term=.22613ea8ecb3

To repeat the Washington Post article that stated the democrats courted the non white voters... and whites perceived the party to be moving away from them.

but... I will add to this... because you argument was so obnoxiously douchey...

You don't even need a college education to understand how left the democrats have moved.
You can read Kennedy inauguration speech.

Or you can see all the you tube clips of the democrats being against immigration because they used to care about jobs and wages for Americans.

On issue after issue you party changed. You used to be against big govt and you were pro liberty. You all were once very pro first amendment now your thought leaders question it.

Gee the democrats have gotten more progressive since 1960 has science advanced too?

You claimed democrats have “abandoned whites”, your words, not mine. I am saying that is a moronic statement and asked if you can point to any one policy that proves your moronic statement.

You can’t because it’s not true. The fact of the matter is that’s how baseless right wingers are, they (you) think there is some kind of race war so you are ignoring all the harm the GOP is doing to working people because you value your race more than your well being. And that makes you a moron.

You believe in the boogie man.