Idaho To NULLIFY Obamacare

The issue of nullification was decided first, by the drafting of the Constitution, which was an express repudiation of the right of nullification previously present in the Articles of Confederation, and by the Civil War, which settled a rebellion partially based on it.
Way back in 1970, Martha Mitchell said this country was going so far to the right no one would recognize it. She was more right than she ever imagined, and I have a feeling she imagined quite a bit.

Anyway, let's just quote the actual Constitution and be done with this crap:


This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
More...
 
Quote from trefoil:

The issue of nullification was decided first, by the drafting of the Constitution, which was an express repudiation of the right of nullification previously present in the Articles of Confederation, and by the Civil War, which settled a rebellion partially based on it.
Way back in 1970, Martha Mitchell said this country was going so far to the right no one would recognize it. She was more right than she ever imagined, and I have a feeling she imagined quite a bit.

Anyway, let's just quote the actual Constitution and be done with this crap:
More...

Nice try. The constitutional problems were discussed in the article if you read it but it's not going to be that easy with possibly over 50% of states taking up nullification.

"There are now 27 states that are in on the lawsuit against Obamacare," Pearce said. "What if those 27 states do the same thing we do with nullification? It's a killer."
 
All fifty could do it. Wouldn't matter from the POV of the Constitution. You're just proving, yet again, that you're a raving loon.
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

I suppose the potato state can do something, and Obama can decide to withhold all federal funding in return.
More...
Now that would be one hell of a GREAT step in the RIGHT direction for Idaho.........DYSFUNCTIONAL CODEPENDENCY is accepted enslavement! :eek:

Bust out of the FEDERAL CHAINS Idaho and run for your life! :cool:
 
Quote from 377OHMS:

+1

Man, no kidding. The guy has no redeeming characteristics whatsoever. Unwanted by both sides. Just an all-around unpleasant guy. I guess its time to add him to my ignore list.

Isn't it remarkable how these leftists implode here in P&R? I notice that Range-Rover flamed out last week and is gone now.
More...
He was spotted at a church on his knees PRAYING they find barry's LONG FORM VAULT COPY Birth Certificate in Hawaii.............. :eek:


:D

:p

:D
 
Quote from trefoil:

All fifty could do it. Wouldn't matter from the POV of the Constitution. You're just proving, yet again, that you're a raving loon.
More...

Its as if the actual wording you posted didn't matter to anyone.
"Supreme" ...they weren't talking about Diana Ross.
 
I really don't understand why we are complaining about nationalized healthcare here while we build hospitals and provide free medical treatment in foreign countries.
 
Quote from PocketChange:

I really don't understand why we are complaining about nationalized healthcare here while we build hospitals and provide free medical treatment in foreign countries.
More...
You can put me down as complaining about that too. We can't afford either.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

You can put me down as complaining about that too. We can't afford either.
More...
HOW DARE YOU!!!


We are exporting "planned" CO-DEPENDENCY and it is our BIGGEST export these days!!!!!!!! :eek:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top