Quote from rmorse:
I'd be happy to discuss this with you privately. To be clear. I have no issue with IB. We are Introducing Brokers to IB. I've never "bashed" them and have incredible respect for the person that started the firm, and he was an AMEX member like myself around the same time.
I have my own opinion about the firm that I'm entitled to based on my knowledge and interaction with both IB and Timberhill, which by the way used to lease one of my Amex memberships. My opinion is that although IB is a great place for many traders, it was created to provide order flow to Timberhill at better rates that it could go out and buy in the street. If clients benefit from that, that great. Other trading operations have done the same thing.
No one firm is best for everyone. When a traders says in a forum, "I'm looking for an alternative", I'm interested in finding out if there is a good fit for us. Not everyone is right for us either.
Not trying to say that IB is perfect. There are things about them that I hate. Their phone service might be the worst in the industry. And their professional client allocation profiles needs some serious help despite numerous promises to fix it, and it is almost enough to cause me to leave them. I'm just saying that the points that you bring up are either untrue or irrelevant.
Also, let's assume that you are correct in that IB was created to provide order flow to TH. Under what circumstances is this a negative for IB customers? Personally, I don't care who is on the other side of my trades. If I get the fills that I want, and they can make money too, more power to them.
All kind of stuff really, where I try my best to isolate some greek and profit of it.