Originally posted by mskl
Firstly, I found your post very misleading. Hyperfeed was a little sarcasim on my part. I inquired about Hyperfeed a few months back and was surprised to hear the cost (I think it was something like $8,000 a month). There is obviously no comparison. One company specializes in data and charges a high rate while the other specializes in order execution and charges you basically the Exchange fees for their data.
Secondly, I would disagree strongly that IB's data is poor relative to retail data providers. I have used TAL, PC Quote, QFeed, Reuters, DTNIQ, ESignal, S&P Comstock and Track Data. Out of those providers, only one had data that was even comparable to IB's data. That is, IB, a broker, has better data than most of the retail data providers!!
Yes, at times IB's data is a little slow but the problems are much worse at many data providers. For a broker that specializes in fast executions, their data is outstanding.
Sorry, you must have me confused with someone else. I have no interest in off shore trading. Thanks though.
What exactly is misleading? All you have to do is put a couple of feeds up side by side, link them to a spread sheet if you have that feature, compare the quote speed by picking some common feature, i.e. total volume, log the results and pick the winner. It is not IB.
And yes, Hyperfeed is expensive, but it works ...
Aren't you the guy out of Canada that wanted cheaper commisions than IB?