Quote from thehangingman:
Yep. Im looking at the running chart right now. As it approached the 100 dollar line it pulled back. Im guessing that traders dont want the same thing happen to them as in early 2005 where IBM suddenly took a dump 20 points. The P/E ratios and fundamentals were similiar in both time periods.
Now we have talk about landings, soft landings, hard landings, etc. How can IBM be a screaming buy when folks are talking about landings? How could IBM thrive in this type of environment?
Quote from thehangingman:
Im thinking thats what everyone is waiting for. If you were a fund manager, wouldnt you want some confirmation before piling your money into a company that definately appears to have a double top on the chart? Maybe Jim Cramer wont look at the chart...
Quote from thehangingman:
I suspected such...they got it up there with small amounts of shares. Then right when it hit 100, they stuck in a block of 56000 shares so they could demonstrate that there is lots of interest up there. Now lets see who takes the bait.