edited my post, link added.
If I could find your statement, I would not ask. I can't find any reference.
If I could find your statement, I would not ask. I can't find any reference.
>>Interactive Brokers is the owner of market maker Timber Hill. It used to be way ahead of the pack, with a state of the art trading system. Alas, times have changed. The market making part of Interactive Brokers is for sale.I was surprised to hear such myself at first but it seems indeed true.
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/is-interactive-brokers-selling-timber-hill.304185/
It does not tell much, nor it explains why it's selling it. Looks more like a rumor to me. But it seems like Interactive Brokers is selling it b/c it's in financial trouble.
>>Interactive Brokers is the owner of market maker Timber Hill. It used to be way ahead of the pack, with a state of the art trading system. Alas, times have changed. The market making part of Interactive Brokers is for sale.
It does not tell much, nor it explains why it's selling it. Looks more like a rumor to me. But it seems like Interactive Brokers is selling it b/c it's in financial trouble.
I will wait for official announcement.
ZZZZ knows everything, you haven't figured that out by now?How do you know that?
IB is huge but a joke in allot of ways. PLatform, data, fees, support.
ZZZZ knows everything, you haven't figured that out by now?
Conflict of interests? I understand that. But from that point whether they get more brokerage clients is very speculative assumption. If this won't improve their bottom line they will have to raise their fees. B/C I think their market making business was the main reason why they could keep their fees down & be profitable.The CEO discussed the reasons in a previous investor call.
"some people believe that our proprietary trading interferes with the pristine nature of our brokerage business. And so, we think that if we had nothing to do with prop trading, we would get more brokerage clients. And given the extremely poor performance of market making, and it really doesn't look like it's going to improve. So we have certain disadvantages that other folks have been successful in overcoming in market making."
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/edited-transcript-ibkr-earnings-conference-031245772.html
Conflict of interests? I understand that. But from that point whether they get more brokerage clients is very speculative assumption. If this won't improve their bottom line they will have to raise their fees. B/C I think their market making business was the main reason why they could keep their fees down & be profitable.