As until now (as usual here) nobody cared to say "thank you":
Thanks IB folks !
Thanks IB folks !
Well said, I agree.Quote from OldTrader:
mike, why don't we amend your statement? Why not say that "some professionals", including you, would care? On the other hand, there are some of us, myself included, prefer getting timely quotes (albeit 10X a second) when things heat up, like during a Fed announcement, when some data providers distinctly lag. Some professionals mike, are not trading for ticks so that each and every tick that takes place becomes less important. What IS important is getting non-lagged data.
Quote from OldTrader:
mike, why don't we amend your statement? Why not say that "some professionals", including you, would care? On the other hand, there are some of us, myself included, prefer getting timely quotes (albeit 10X a second) when things heat up, like during a Fed announcement, when some data providers distinctly lag. Some professionals mike, are not trading for ticks so that each and every tick that takes place becomes less important. What IS important is getting non-lagged data.
OldTrader
Quote from minmike:
I can see what you are saying. Lagged quotes can/could be a huge problem.
Whether one is "trading for ticks" or not, missing the best execution, effects anyones profits.
I personally would not tolerate either of the data provider problems that we have discussed. I guess I assumed that a professional, missing a tick once or twice a month, would find it economically justified to pay for a high quality data provider.
Quote from OldTrader:
Here's how I'm looking at it mike: Let's say I'm trading CL, and let's say I miss a tick, but I pick up a $.50-$1.00 move. Per contract, that $10 versus $500-$1000. To me, that's not significant. Now admittedly, some guys are trading for 4-5 ticks in the CL market. Obviously to them that 1 tick might be VERY significant. Here's the rub, even if I knew the tick existed, the question becomes whether my trade would have taken place at that spot anyway. To tell you the truth, after all these years, I just don't know if I'm that good. LOL.
By the way, we also have to assume that the top or bottom tick happens to be the "missing" tick that took place in less than 100 milliseconds. The odds of that happening EVERY time are pretty low. Further, as I understand it, IB now encompasses the high and low of each 1 second bar in their data, so that even though you "might" not see the tick, your chart will reflect it.
Just a different perspective.
OldTrader
Quote from stock777:
I was referring to trading the old fashioned way, by hand, and I defy you to tell me that 3X 5X vs 10X is going to make a difference. I can think of SOME information that could be missed but I dont think thats what is being discussed here.
If you are not IN the market already with a limit order, what diff does it make if a wild tick happens in 1/10 of a second?
If you think you are going to 'see' the tick and react to it , even mechanically , and get filled, I doubt it very much.
Tthe update rate does not affect anyones fills, assuming they are already in the market with a limit order.