OT:
Well it looks like someone has to get off his or her arse and do something. I do some consultancy work with organizations that feel that they are being suppressed. You all sound just like they do... My answer to them is to; "Do something about it." Yapping here isn't going to get anything constructive done. Create a web page where traders can register and sign petitions, try to rally traders (big and small) around the idea of a few sick days, That will REALLY wake up the brokers, and they are the ones that can put pressure on the SEC. You could use a site and petition to "haggle" CNBC, CNNfn, and Bloomberg to "really" address this issue. Try to arrange for a couple of traders (small) and a couple of broker reps to do an interview in the financial media (TV would be great, but even a paper or magazine). Call the "money" magazines and etc.. These guys would love to have a ready-made story. Even a well placed add in Barons, or IBD will go along ways (Raise cash for this (paypall) on your new website, I will pay my share for small constructive actions.)
IMO it won't reverse this rule, and I seriously doubt it can be reversed by traders alone. Your goal should be to "modify this rule" and most importantly stop additional restraints. This rule wouldn't be so bad if they did it on a scale that started at 0 margin at 10,000 (but can daytrade cash) or so, and went to 4 to 1 margin at 50-60,000.
The problem you all have; in regards to my post is: I am not directly affected by this rule. The only way that I am "touched" is by IB not offering more credit access. So I will be going to another firm in due time. If I was directly affected I would stand up and fight. I will even assit someone; Make calls, write letters, and etc. Just as a precaution from future rules, and my own strong desire for justice.
Anyway, if anyone wants to shut-up and step-up-to-the-plate you have my support.