I have been placing many "Limit if Touched" orders that do not get activated because the stock price trades through my trigger price but does not trade at my trigger price. As an alternative to "Limit if Touched" orders, "Limit if < or =" orders and the "Limit if > or =" orders can be entered by using the "conditional orders" window but this takes too many steps and too much time for a quick setup of the order parameters.
I would like to see IB make TWS changes to allow "Limit if < or =" orders and the "Limit if > or =" orders to be entered directly from the order line of TWS. This could be done by adding these order types to the order type "Drop Down Box" on the order line for the underlying symbol.
Another method of accomplishing the same result would be to change the TWS trigger method of "Limit if Touched" orders so the order would trigger if the trade price trades at or through the trigger price. Maybe the "Limit if Touched" trigger method is already set up that this way but many of my orders are not being triggered when the trade price trades through my trigger price without trading at my trigger price.
I would like to see IB make TWS changes to allow "Limit if < or =" orders and the "Limit if > or =" orders to be entered directly from the order line of TWS. This could be done by adding these order types to the order type "Drop Down Box" on the order line for the underlying symbol.
Another method of accomplishing the same result would be to change the TWS trigger method of "Limit if Touched" orders so the order would trigger if the trade price trades at or through the trigger price. Maybe the "Limit if Touched" trigger method is already set up that this way but many of my orders are not being triggered when the trade price trades through my trigger price without trading at my trigger price.
ther.jar:rss.jar jclient.LoginFrame .