Quote from rcj:
02-10-10 12:31 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from Full Tilt:
makes one wonder what motive would drive someone to have such a tireless obsession to defend IB- doesn't it.
still waiting, ol buddy. Yes - No ??
sadly, the answer is yes.
i think i represent a lot of IB customers in that i am a customer by necessity rather than by choice. key word being "choice". much to my puzzlement, no other broker has stepped up to truly compete with IB. therefore, if you trade a lot of shares, plus trade index futures, plus trade copper, gold etc- they really are the only game in town.
I don't chime in on the nut case threads, but, personally, i think IB trades against me/us. most of their profits come from trading, not commissions. if you trade volume, and have traded on a more "professional" platform before, after time i think you'd be hard pressed not to draw this conclusion.
further, i feel IB is not very responsive to clients, even clients who generate well into 6 figures of revenue/year to them. TWS is a mess and i truly think they don't care. They will hide known issues and blame it on your connection, or computer, or anything but them. it's very frustrating when these things end up costing me several thousand dollars. i make enough of my own mistakes. I find it incredible that a broker can bring down their trading server for maintenance during trading hours, but IB has done this several times on a friday without notifying customers.
now, it's not all bad. there are many good things about IB. thing is, with only 5% more effort, they could be a GREAT broker, they just choose not to. to me, given what to pay them, that is very frustrating.
the reason for my post was obvious (and accurate)