Quote from HoundDogOne:
You misunderstood my post. Perhaps finding your glasses might help.
I am a software engineer by profession...
I had a security token for years with a New York clearing firm...
And in no way did I imply that "it doesn't work"... or whatever you are talking about.
I have a 7 figure account... and wire funds to one account ONLY (for legal reasons).
Neither myself... or IB... or anyone... is authorized to wire funds to ANY other account EVER.
And for this I need a security token...
Which, in your "professional opinion" is 100% foolproof...
Never gets lost... or battery... or any other hardware/software error.
Every other broker in the world can do it...
But IB is too inflexible to allow wires to one specific bank account ONLY...
Which can ONLY be changed with WRITTEN authorization.
That is 70s, 80s, 90s, and 2000s... and 100% secure...
Unlike the theoretical 99% security... and inconvenience that comes with a security token.
IB's total reliance on the internet...
Creates ** indeterminate ** security issues... that do not exist at other firms.
In my professional opinion...
There are many examples today where human intelligence...
Is replaced by ill conceived software I call "artificial stupidity"...
Because "artificial stupidity" is MUCH cheaper than "human intelligence"....
And IB has many systems that fall into this "automate at any cost" category.