Quote from davez:
Thanks for the suggestion, Jim. I'll take a look at it.
Just to clarify.. I know eSignal has all kinds of display options for T&S, but I'd be surprised if eSignal has better or faster data than IB? Were the limitations you were referring to with regard to Quotetracker display options, or eSignal data speed/quality?
Regards
davez
I don't think there is a problem with e-signal T&S quality. I think it might be a little slower than IB's datafeed, but E-signal's real-time T&S is far more complete than IB's datafeed. Each has its pros and cons.
E-signal provides complete info, including all regional exchanges. IB provides no bid/ask data from regional exchanges, none whatsoever.
IB data include, and QT will display, bid/ask for each separate order destination covered by IB, but last trade prices and volume, provided by IB, cover the entire market, and are not broken down separately for each of the various order destinations. So QT can't break them down by order destination, when you are using the IB datafeed for QT.
E-signal, unlike IB, will provide separate last trade prices for each of the various order destinations. IB can only provide separate bid/ask for each of the various order destinations.
Limitations of QT T&S are that you can't display a T&S which shows you which order destination was the source of a particular last trade price. You can either display T&S for all markets combined for a particular symbol, or you can display T&S for one particular order destination. If your QT datafeed is IB, then your QT T&S will show you bid/ask for any one order destination, or for all order destinations combined, but your QT T&S will always show all last trade prices from all order destinations combined, even if you are only looking at a bid/ask from one particular order destination.
This may be confusing, but you can try QT for free, and then you will better understand. I think E-signal is overpriced. So try QT, and look at what you can get with T&S.