Quote from late apex:
If I didn't have a trading business to run, I'd gladly point out some of the critical flaws in your reasoning, your thinking process, over the next few days, weeks or however long that discussion might take. However, even if I were able to set aside the necessary time, unless you happen to have a PhD in statistics, an MBA in analytical finance and a couple of decades of experience playing with the quantitative nature of markets, such a discussion might not be fair to you. If nothing else, you might want to peruse acrary's journal, just for fun.
If, based on your beliefs, you are consistently profitable in your trading, more power to you. Then there's no real reason for you to alter those beliefs, is there?
late apex, please be more specific.
Are you denying the CFTC's oft-repeated warning about trading systems, that "Past performance is no guarantee of future results"?
Are you denying that almost all traders eventually lose and give up on trading, even if they have a temporary period of making profits which are subsequently lost?
Are you denying the CFTC's warning that there is a serious problem with fradulent brokers, especially in the area of so-called "foreign currency trading"? (I say so-called, because there are no foreign currencies involved with such trading in retail spot markets; with few exceptions, retail spot FX customers are actually entering into bets as to how their broker will next choose to manipulate its own quotes, but they are not actually trading foreign currencies or participating in actual FX markets.)
Are you denying that there is a serious problem with compulsive gambing behaviours, especially by inexperienced traders, and that the industry preys upon human weaknesses?
Do you claim to have special credentials so that inexperienced traders should believe your point of view without proof?
