Quote from paradox:
Why do some market makers on IB ideal-pro post odd sizes like 999,999?
Quote from def:
robert,
more volume is immaterial, it is the addition of liquidity that matters. this has improved substantially since our initial offering. If you do give it another try, I'm confident you'll be pleased with the results.
On another note, as of today, the IB home page is showing "live" FX quotes (I put that in quotes as they might update every 15 seconds).
Quote from Hoi:
That does not have to be a MM...I actually think it is a ButtonTrader user, who has initially entered a 1 mln Order, but during the trade has Joined a 1 lot Lilac-FX-cash position, which he had in the opposite direction. (1mln minus 1 is 999,999).
{You will see more of these odd-lots when ButtonTrader users are trading IDEALPRO. (I bit off topic to explain the Lilac-FX-cash here)}.
Quote from Trayo:
Hello Def, Would you please explain the dif between volume and liquidity?
Thanks!
Quote from paradox:
Interesting possibility. I just read up on the "Lilav-FX-cash" in your release notes. How did the user end up with 1 lot though, that is not clear.
Quote from fhr999:
For an active traders there no way to trade other than with an ECN.Trading with a Broker you are at a huge disadvantage versus the market.For example if you compare prices there is no way a broker can compete with an ECN.I have now for a few months compared prices between Currenex and Saxo.If you trade Eur/Doll Doll/yen Doll/chf and some crosses like Eur/yen
the difference of the spread makes a huge difference.I had the other day an example to show you why.I had an order to sell 5 mio Doll/yen at 95.the quote Saxo provided was 93.5/96.5
and Currenex 94/95.Then the price went 95/96 with Currenex
and my order was done.This price was paid more than 5 times.
Guess what happened with Saxo their best price was never
better than 93.5.I think in the future that the Ecn model will increase and put a huge pressure on all these brokers to adapt and change their way of trading