Quote from just21:
If you are long stocks then current available funds would be the same as the stock value because you can borrow against the stock. It just seems that you can take more risk by being long stocks then staying in cash.
Yes and you have found a very interesting loophole.
Let's say that you sell a bunch of call's. If you are long stock then your portfolio value increases as the margin requirements go up. And if your portfolio falls then your margin requirements go down as your stocks go down.
Of course to earn a decent return this is not a linear relationship since most likely you will sell more contracts than stock.
But you are not wrong, and in fact that is what I do. I allocate about 60% to stock, and 60% to option selling, without touching one bit of leverage. By going long stock you get the benefit of dividends, and by being short options you don't have to worry about getting your shares called or having to pay servicing fees.
It really is a win-win situation.
THOUGH, manage your risk. Such a construct while easy to talk about requires very very strict risk management. Just yesterday I partially took off a GC option position because I overdid it on the risk. The position was not loosing money, it just was a wrong risk allocation.
AND such a construct is not a high money maker, but it is a consistent money maker. Thus don't exceed your risk profile!