Quote from given2trade:
What we're saying is:
1) An arbitrary rule on sub $250 million market caps is completely absurd. I can name you a dozens of large cap stocks that are infinitely more risky than my small cap value holdings.
2) They are not losing money by offering margin at these levels. My guess is they had 1 bad account and are acting as a result.
3) They could have offered more than 2 days before implementation. As you said, this isn't a game. I have major tax issues I'd have to deal with if I was forced to sell many of my positions.
Agree with that IB is not made to use with margin, however chnaging rules quickly with little notice is not appropriate, neither making your money safer.Quote from sprstpd:
I guess you don't remember how many small cap stocks got absolutely bludgeoned during the 2007-2008 financial crisis.
No one is forcing you to be on margin. As an IB customer who only uses margin in very particular cases, I welcome any margin rules that they deem appropriate given the current environment. If you don't like them, then close your account.
Quote from jayre:
Agree 100%. Would the IB micro cap rule
"adjusted for all the shares that are private and part of the partnership" when they calculate if a stock is a micro cap? Also how about small etf's can they use margin?
Quote from given2trade:
Isn't everything someone posts their opinion?
Man, the IB shills on here are hilarious. How anyone can step back and think this margin change is fair and/or good for their business is beyond me.
Quote from stock777:
what happens when the mkt cap drops from 300mm to 240mm, and you have it on margin. Are you forced to puke it up?