IB less and less reliable

Quote from RedDuke:
Guys, I just do not get it, why don’t you just call the desk and confirm that you positions were closed and/or ask IB rep to close them when you have these issues. Seems very simple to me.
:confused: Did you read the first post?
Quote from Kicking:
I was trying to close a number of positions and some orders would not turn green. When I called , a message said the wait was more than 10 minutes
 
Quote from risktaker:

The funny thing about all of us discussing issues with IB is that it must somehow give the impression to non-customers that their software must not be very good which is not the case at all.
"Somehow give the impression..... " Do ya think ... ????? :D :D :D

At 1st, I read the threads to help me decide if I wanted to switch. At least for the time being, that choice is off the table. Many brokers & software providers have some level of 'bugs', but when you combine those bugs w/ poor, not-available customer service - switching is not a viable option. While I don't consider myself in need of any 'hand-holding', I also don't need any additional sources of frustration in my life. Since this is one of the ongoing IB free services, I'll pass (good for you guys - right? One less person...)

Now, the threads make for good entertainment. The uber-strong feelings on both sides provide an occasional chuckle ... :cool:
 
Quote from kiwi_trader:

There is the benefit in making the software / setup look bad that we will get less n00bs joining IB and causing unneeded support hassles (not saying that anyone in this thread except perhaps robin is in that category).

I wonder if I'm fortunate to be trading off the Hong Kong server for Asian markets because there are a number of us out here and we are not seeing these problems. Is it because we're futures only? Or is the server farm more lightly loaded?

One thing ... for any n00bie readers of this thread ... if you don't know what you are doing I support the recommendation that you stay away from IB. Its a low cost high technology provider and "service" and "hand holding" are NOT in their mission statement. Experienced traders only need apply.

i dont know how their servers are setup but maybe an seperate the futures and stock data? give people the option to use one or the other and then supply tick data?:)
 
For what it's worth I haven't experienced poor customer service with IB. I have had a few long delays trying to connect to their online help though. Mostly the support staff have been very helpful even when some of my questions were a bit simplistic.

Also, while not perfect, their TWS has worked well. (The charting needs lots of improvement but I don't use TWS for charting anyway so it's not a problem.) The few dropped connections I experience when using TWS are due to my ISP and not IB.

I'm from Canada and while that means nothing as far as getting good customer support maybe we are lucky to have a good IB branch here.

I am not a long time trader (but am past the noobie stage) and have been able to use IB very comfortably. I recommend them. It's hard to beat their commissions.
 
Quote from kiwi_trader:


I wonder if I'm fortunate to be trading off the Hong Kong server for Asian markets because there are a number of us out here and we are not seeing these problems. Is it because we're futures only? Or is the server farm more lightly loaded?

I connect to the Asian servers here in Manila and I've been getting quite a bit more pink outs lately (probably last 2 months) and quite honestly, it's aggravating. It seems to happen just when critical data is being released.

Overall though, I can't force myself to switch to another broker as that's just one of the few quirks IB has. I'd still highly recommend IB to newbies though because of ease of use, ability to use 3rd party interfaces, and commission structure.

Happy with IB, but could be happier :D
 
Trading US Equity/options/futures etc at IB out of India . (some times Singapore too) I dont know which server Iam connecting to HKG or US. but no problems other the few re connects described above.
Most of the time scalping very fast watching QT charts.! Happy camper at IB after a long learning curve at TD Water House,OptionsXpress,{Dreyfus,Datek,Mr Stock etc during late 90's}
For some one who trade big size ,not able to avail instant phone customer service problem. Iam yet to have such bravado.
For people who want $1 ticket for 200 shares,Ib is paradise. Try trading SPY or OIH 20 to 30 times a day 200/400 shares a pop(also SPY options). Commission Savings /year =$ 50k. That is what I paid more with previousl mentioned brokers!!
 
Actually i haven't had many reliability issues with TWS or the data feed. Sure i'll get the occasional pinkout, but it's rare like several times a year. but as others have said, once you get the pinkout TWS has trouble recovering. You usually have to close it and restart it.
 
Same here. Very little if any connection issues for a very long time.

Reconnect , when there an occasional short interruption is never a problem, no restart needed.

Suspect many IP related issues get blamed on TWS.
 
It depends on the trading style. For swing traders, pinkouts don't matter at all. For scalpers, it can result in heavy losses depending on severity.
 
Quote from TOM134:

kicking,

Yes, from what I've heard at ET, IB is really the pits for reliability.

You may wish to check out one of Success Trade's platforms:

http://www.successtrade.com/index.html

I hope this helps.

Tom

"In the next coming months, Success Trade will be offering direct access trading on a per share basis. Per share pricing will be at $.002 per share all inclusive for smart-routed orders, or at $.004 per share all inclusive of any ECN fees for orders directed to ECNs.
Customers will have the option of routing orders to all major ECNs or through a proprietary auto-routing system under one simple per share pricing structure."

Sounds like they are trying to re-invent the wheel. No trading software available yet.

Anyway, is there a viable alternative to IB at this point? This company is not.

John
 
Back
Top