Thanks guys, I know your right FCM 's "should" know the ins and outs of futures therefore be better to deal with.
Its frustrating because you are not really rewarded for defined risk trades when trading futures. Because you can't roll a future option as one order (you are forced to leg in and out) there is the theoretical risk of a greater loss than your debit. To me this smacks of lack of willingness on the part of brokers to invest in the technology that allows traders to trade futures options as they would regular equity options.
In a way you are encouraged to be a seller rather than a buyer. I can't sell a 1970 SPX call/put without putting up insane margin, however I can sell a 1970 ES option for very small margin. So as traders if you want to define your risk via spreads the SPX is certainly better, but if you want to SELL strangles/straddles than I guess Futures options are the way, however if they go against you for any length of time you are SOL.
Its frustrating because you are not really rewarded for defined risk trades when trading futures. Because you can't roll a future option as one order (you are forced to leg in and out) there is the theoretical risk of a greater loss than your debit. To me this smacks of lack of willingness on the part of brokers to invest in the technology that allows traders to trade futures options as they would regular equity options.
In a way you are encouraged to be a seller rather than a buyer. I can't sell a 1970 SPX call/put without putting up insane margin, however I can sell a 1970 ES option for very small margin. So as traders if you want to define your risk via spreads the SPX is certainly better, but if you want to SELL strangles/straddles than I guess Futures options are the way, however if they go against you for any length of time you are SOL.