How is that relevant here?That was before we had circuit breakers.
How is that relevant here?That was before we had circuit breakers.
How is that relevant here?
Since it sounds like you were, why don't you explain it to me? Make sure not to use words that are too big, I tend to get confused easily.You wouldnt be asking such a dumb question if you traded ES during the recent meltdown.
The knuckleheads on ET think the margin requirements are too high......
I call bullshit. IB does not allow opening positions on physical settled positions that close to settlement. Post a screenshot.
so far got no advice and plenty of people who called me a liar with no reason.
Below is a scrsht with the trade (bought at 0.01) and another one showing current price of the contract - it’s zero which kind of proves that they never expected it to go below zero and haven’t adjusted neither charts nor orders.
View attachment 225740
View attachment 225741
Creator,
IB doesn'allow customer to trade futures having physical delivery over the last trading days (or hours):
https://www.interactivebrokers.com/...owcategories=&p=physical&cc=&limit=100&page=1For WTI traded on Nymex, last trading day for CLK0 was April 19.
Si, it's very strange seeing you able to buy CLK0 on April 20 (sorry, don't know if this fact is of any help for you, but IB allowing you to buy on April 20 was again their own stated rules).
And I know these rules were generally in force, because yesterday, when CLK0 turned finally positive I tried to send an order using TWS, but was unable to send it to market; instead I received a warning about my order not being accepted, according to their "physical delivery futures" rules.
So, speaking about the 88Mln loss, my guess is .............. it comes from IB customers trading CLM0, because nobody could trade CLK0 in April, 20 (and 21) with them.
If my guess is right, the 88Mln loss in not related to negative prices of CLK0, but to the unprecedented volatilty of CLM0.
And this is a bit worrying, as I (as everybody) used to think that IB risk management is able to identify in real time a margin call, and close the position before the account goes negative....
Creator,
IB doesn'allow customer to trade futures having physical delivery over the last trading days (or hours):
https://www.interactivebrokers.com/...owcategories=&p=physical&cc=&limit=100&page=1
At IB, last trading day for CLK0 was April 17.
Si, it's very strange seeing you able to buy CLK0 on April 20 (sorry, don't know if this fact is of any help for you, but IB allowing you to buy on April 20 was again their own stated rules).
And I know these rules were generally in force, because yesterday, when CLK0 turned finally positive I tried to send an order using TWS, but was unable to send it to the market. When i clicked on "Transmit order" I received a warning about my order not being accepted, according to their "physical delivery futures" rules.
So, speaking about the 88Mln loss, my guess is .............. it comes from IB customers trading CLM0, because nobody could trade CLK0 in April, 20 (and 21) with them.
If my guess is right, the 88Mln loss in not related to negative prices of CLK0, but to the unprecedented volatilty of CLM0.
And this is a bit worrying, as I (as everybody) used to think that IB risk management is able to identify in real time a margin call, and close the position before the account goes negative....
thanks for the reply but ZBZB is right - it was IPE contract
Although my account is indeed terrifyingly negative and I have no idea what to do about that
thanks for the reply but ZBZB is right - it was IPE contract
Although my account is indeed terrifyingly negative and I have no idea what to do about that