smokey_mcPaat
Guest
Originally posted by dottom
Forget the "professional" atmosphere at prop firms, the "better software" or even the "learning from others" relationship that many prop firms advertise about.
Whether to go with IB or Prop is simple. Access to leverage & bullets. (And if you are not a winning trader, then also add the ability to risk firm capital.)
If you have enough equity where 4:1 margin is enough for your day trading needs, then all you'll need is IB. I suspect that eventually IB will offer bullets which will make prop firms even less attractive for the well-funded trader.
I see no problems with a prop firm charging more on commissions when they are taking a risk by providing you with leverage. What if IB was allowed to offer customers a slightly higher rate if the customer wanted 40:1 leverage? I think a lot of people would jump all over that.
true, i do use most of the leverage that the firm provides so i guess that in part justifies higher commissions, but it still hurts my bottom line.
and realistically, how can IB be that competitive if they don't even offer bullets?- they are an essential tool to my trading and i would never trade at a firm that did not offer them.
and for those of you that trade at IB, like i said earlier, i am not labeling you all as scrubs, so please don't take it that way.
but don't label me as a naive trader because i trade at the firm i do- i am there for various reasons not important enough to discuss and am quite happy there, although i feel commissions could be a bit more competitive- i have many friends and contacts throughout this industry and know what everyone else pays in terms of rates- this is the basis for my griping. and if you think i am a piker, think again- lets just say that i easily net over 6 figures a year- and i am 25 years old.- sure beats working as a monkey analyst for a measly $60K/year!!! i love trading and can't think of anything that i would rather do. peace,
smokey