Quote from CONR:
How do other traders feel about QT compared to some of the other pay charting sites? I.E. Esignal, Aspen Graphics, etc.
I have used a variety of software applications, including eSignal, etc and if you don't need automation or backtesting, I would highly recommend Quote Tracker for many types of trading.
If you are using it with IB or MB Trading, you will still need to subscribe to backfill market data, so you should factor that in to your thinking. I use IQFeed and it is like $20 a month or so for real-time and backfill equity data.
It takes a little bit of time to get accustomed to QT and get it all set up, largely because it is so customizable. After getting it all set up and familiar with it, I have had no serious problems at all. And on the rare occasion I have had a question about something, I sent an email to the QT and got a generous reply almost immediately. You can't beat that kind of support (IB, are you listening?)
That said, it has some limitations for certain kinds of trading. For trading futures I like a DOM, and that is missing.
Jerry, any plans for a DOM type entry? That would be a great add. I would much rather use QT for ordering rather than Ninja.
Also, if you scalp multiple stocks and like to have multiple order entry windows open, you my find QT's one order window a limitation. It is pretty quick to use populate with a symbol with CTRL + T, but you can't set up a series of entries in advance like you could with something like other programs.
One last thought, QT offers a free version. And if you are already have an IB account, you can just check it out and see if it meets your charting needs and trading style.
Hope it helps,
Enzo