Quote from Bitstream:
that's your freaking choice innit.
Quote from palmbeachdude:
I don't think he's saying unbundled won't apply. He's saying that you will get stuck taking liqu, not adding.
Quote from SL65:
Unfortunately, if you go direct to INET, you don't qualify for unbundled pricing so you're in even worse shape.
Quote from jimrockford:
Wrong. If you execute thru TWS, then you will get unbundled pricing on non-SMART routed orders. If you execute thru the API, then you can exclude ARCA, NYSE, and AMEX from SMART-routing, and still avoid the particular scenario you give.
Quote from palmbeachdude:
Some months ago, you had a problem with commish on an unbundled trade and said you were going to get back when you got an answer. I never did find out what resolution you got. What I am getting at here is can we trust unbundled or not?
Quote from jimrockford:
The problem I had back in February, IB has determined, resulted from IB's failure to update IB's documentation, to reflect changes to ECN fees and rebates. The commission charges were correct, but since I was relying on bad documentation, my expectations and calculations, as to commissions, were incorrect.
I think we can trust unbundled, but based on this and many other incidents encountered by many other IB customers, I think that we need to keep reminding IB that it needs to place higher priority on keeping documentation up to date and accurate.
Quote from jimrockford:
Wrong. If you execute thru TWS, then you will get unbundled pricing on non-SMART routed orders. If you execute thru the API, then you can exclude ARCA, NYSE, and AMEX from SMART-routing, and still avoid the particular scenario you give.