Quote from stock777:
I have NOT observed a problem with quotes. I think the good Professor would need to provide more evidence than the colorful 'suicide"
Quote from Catoosa:
Relleum:
I have been using RealTick 3 data and software for 8 years and would not want to trade without it. The cost is $250 per month plus exchange fees. CQG, eSignal, and TradeStation would also do what is needed. I have not used QuoteTracker but from what I have read about it here on ET, I do not think it would not meet my requirements. I tried Ensign and it fell far short of my needs. When I have my money on the table, I want all of the information I can get displayed the way I want it. My big expense is not the cost of the data and software but my losses when I am on the wrong side of a position.
Quote from ProfLogic:
I don't get to use colorful terms very often, sorry. It is just that IB locked up when I would apply so many charts to it. It could not handle having that much information sucked out of it from one source.
It isn't my computers either. I run a Dual core AMD 4800 with 2 gig of RAM and the only program running on the system at the time was IB and MultiCharts. I currently run eSignal and MultiCharts and have over 13 workspaces and 60 charts open and no hiccups whatsoever. My internet is cable based and I'm running 4 to 5 meg up and down.
You said you haven't observed a problem with the quotes, may I ask when the last time you did a side by side, tick for tick comparison of the data? Also, how many markets and separate contracts months do you watch at one time?
Quote from ProfLogic:
I concur. My trading bill for feed and internet for all of my systems is about $1300 a month for which I have budgeted a half day's trading. The biggest expense is bad or inconsistent data.
Quote from stock777:
I've run Quotetracker off of IB for years, and never had a problem related to the number of 'charts' that I had open. I also draw data into Excel on the SAME machine from the same TWS simultaneously. Never a problem with quotes. And this is on a box quite a bit slower than yours.
imo, the quote feed, other than the fact that some ticks are aggregated, is as fast as I've seen. Very hard to compare with only one setup in any case.
The backfill issue is unrelated to the speed of the quote servers. Some fills are fast, some seem to take forever. Not asking for 5 years of tick data, we are talking about 1 bars minute for a few days, a trivial amount of data.
The new method of dropping requests over a certain amount, should be making things better, but I don't see it.
Quote from OldTrader:
I think you should mention you've had a case of the ass at IB for some time now....you are hardly an unbiased source of information.
For what it's worth, I've never had a problem with IB QUOTES. Never used the charts. There is a distinction there.
OldTrader
They don't offer it...(yet)Quote from droskill:
Anybody have any comment on using MBTrading backfill? Or do they even offer it?