Based on the linked Babypips article, do you see any possible entry trigger there?In your link, the price returns to the average value (red moving average) and starts from the average. The price goes around the average value.
Based on the linked Babypips article, do you see any possible entry trigger there?In your link, the price returns to the average value (red moving average) and starts from the average. The price goes around the average value.
Yes. I do.Based on the linked Babypips article, do you see any possible entry trigger there?
Sounds reasonable.Yes. I do.
There are 3 enters in your picture( chart). Every enter was after the price returned to the average value (red moving average). If I went in, I will go in after the price go up. Stop loss under the minimum of the moving average. So it turns out to go with a small stop and a very large profit becouse it is trend. I add picture ( chart) in this comment with points enters
makes sense now. where did you educate? is it experience?I opened the short position.
Why did i open short position? I opened the short position because the fast moving average crossed the slow one
Hello. I didn't study trading. I think, that simple logic is working in the market. But maybe i am wrong, becouse now my account has lossmakes sense now. where did you educate? is it experience?
This is a terrible place to take a short. Look at the trends. Up trend is in neutral. Down trend does not exist. An up trend in neutral does not mean there is a down trend.I opened the short position.
Why did i open short position? I opened the short position because the fast moving average crossed the slow one
Isn't that the objective, making big gains and small losses?Otherwise you will make big gains and make lots of losses. And if you try to make the losses small, you might also cut off the big gains when the slightly retrace.
Isn't that the objective, making big gains and small losses?
I agree with what you are saying but I'm not sure what system the OP is using.Of course, but the W/L ratio matters for not only the PL but also the drawdown risk.
The MA cross method the OP wants to use is classic to work in trends but get chopped to death in a range bound market. So you get big gains on trends days and range days get many small losses.
The trade management will make or break the PL. So he will try to lower the number of losses or make the losses smaller. But the trend trades have to have room to run and get majority of the available trend trades. Sort of the opposites for trade management.
That is why most abandon the MA cross over "strategy". They can't get a trade management system (tail end of the trade), good enough. Not good enough for the effort, risk, comms, etc.
Almost everyone has tried this and realized there are better ways that require less risk while in the trade, and easier management of the tail end of the trade.