Of the references Powell cites... The first 5 which discuss the science and not the consensus are skeptical.
Powell is a joke.
My comments in Bold.
I got bored after the first 5 showing Powell to be a liar or poor researcher.
Anderegg W., Prall J. W., Harold J., Schneider S. H. (2010). Expert credibility in climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 12107-12109. ,
Google Scholar
- discusses consensus not science
Atkin E. (2015). Ted Cruz challenged science at his climate change hearing: Science won. Retrieved from
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/12/10/3729732/ted-cruz-and-science-have-a-rocky-relationship/ ,
Google Scholar
- Soros type internet rag discussing Ted Cruz... not science
Avakyan S. V. (2013a). Problems of climate as a problem of optics. Journal of Optical Technology, 80, 717-721. ,
Google Scholar
Says - its the sun ...
Avakyan S. V. (2013b). The role of solar activity in global warming. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 83, 275-285. ,
Google Scholar
Says its the sun
Cook J., Nuccitelli D., Green S. A., Richardson M., Winkler B., Painting R., . . . Skuce A. (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8, 024024. ,
Google Scholar
Consensus discussion not science
Doran P. T., Zimmerman M. K. (2009). Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 90(3), 22-23. ,
Google Scholar
Consensus discussion not science
Gervais F. (2014). Tiny warming of residual anthropogenic CO2. International Journal of
Modern Physics B, 28, 1450095. ,
Google Scholar
"The tiny anthropogenic warming appears consistent with the absence of any detectable change of slope of the 130-year-long linear contribution to the temperature data before and after the onset of large CO2 emissions. "
This seems to be saying man might be doing it regardless of the onset of co2 emissions. I call the abstract skeptical
Read More:
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217979214500957
Happer W. (2014). Why has global warming paused? International Journal of Modern Physics A, 29, 1460003. ,
Google Scholar
A Freeman Dyson update. Dyson has become a famous critic of the IPCC. So this is probably a skeptical article in which he stated the models and the predictions are too far apart.
Hug H. (2013). “The Climate Models are inadequate”: Heinz Hug queries the significance of CO2 for climate change. Nachrichten Aus Der Chemie, 61, 132. ,
Google Scholar
Another Skeptical Article
Kolbert E. (2007). Field notes from a catastrophe: Man, nature, and climate change. New York, NY: Bloomsbury. ,
Google Scholar
Kuhn T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. ,
Google Scholar
Obama B. (2013). Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #Climate change is real, man-made and dangerous. Retrieved from
,
Google Scholar
Oreskes N. (1999). The rejection of continental drift: Theory and method in American earth science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. ,
Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2015). Public and scientists’ views on science and society. Retrieved from
http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/ ,
Google Scholar
Powell J. L. (2015). Four revolutions in the earth sciences: From heresy to truth. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. ,
Google Scholar
Weart S. R. (2008). The discovery of global warming. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ,
Google Scholar