Quote from Rorschach_test:
if you please
Volume is the independent variable.
Price is the dependent variable.
the maths is finite math.
Keynes explains algorithms.
They must be complete and they must be in-kind.
"IF" is where the independent variable is fitted.
So for volume (using the PM of the HS), increasing and decreasing are the complete set of possibilities.
some would say unchanging is also there. We grant them their wish and move back to the opportunity they are missing.
The "THEN" is used to express the resulting dependent variable status. Two "ing's" cover all the bases: continuing and changing.
Reflect on the problem solving. A means of making money is sought. Market cycles are available. A cycle has two money making parts. Each part is called a trend. Trends overlap.
We have just laid out the vector aspects of two variables which could form a complete Hypothesis Set (HS) which has a Parametric measure (PM).
Does any of this fit into a child's life in an educational system?
So you meld together an HS with its PM and see trends have three moves in a parallelogram (channel). A tend end is the beginning of a new opposite trend. You see the overlap. Overlap's ending has one criteria. Two trends form a market cycle.
In a finite maths context, all of this system is articulated by Boolean Algebra as indicated by Carnap's logic Theory. The fact that markets can be automated is a conclusion that is not difficult to reach.
Cycles composed of trends in channels while using price points and coresponding peaks and throughs of volume all do fit together as true/false contexts. What makes is clear and easy is the Order Of Events (OOE's) of these subsytems which form the whole.
Look at the system of operation of the markets as a Rabbit Hole.
Do rabbit holes serve the needs of a rabbit's existence and his environment? Notice that this labyrinth required two things: digging and work. What happens to rabbits who do not dig or work? They meet Alice in wonderland and drink tea with a guy who uses mercury to make felt for hats. On the otherhand, rich rabbits have larger rabbit holes.
Why would a mathematician write about a Chesire cat and such?