I voted for Trump to destroy the GOP - The GOP must die.

People on ET have been saying this for a long time, but few listened. See below for a section that is highlighted - ET playing out every day. I don't think the GOP is dead. But mark my words, just like Occupy Wall Street changed the Democratic Party, this will change the GOP.

Imo, next election cycle, it will be MUCH worse than this.

I voted for Trump to destroy the GOP


"We have a very serious political problem in this country. Our system of government works best when it is balanced between roughly equal political parties, one on the center-right and the other on the center-left.

Unfortunately, what we have is a centrist Democratic Party and a far-right Republican Party. Therefore, the system is out of balance, creating gridlock even as the public cries out for action on serious problems such as our deteriorating public infrastructure, epitomized by that in Flint, Michigan.

I believe that Republicans made a deal with the devil in 2009 when they embraced the Tea Party, a populist group who were just mad as hell and weren't going to take it anymore. In Congress, the Tea Party has been aggressive in destroying all the norms that made it work for more than 200 years.

103443277-RTX2692Q.530x298.jpg

Mike Segar | Reuters
The government was shut down, increases in the debt limit are constantly at risk, nominations to even the most minor administration positions are blocked and, now, the president has been denied the opportunity, which is his right under the Constitution, to name a new justice to the Supreme Court.

Flush with such "victories," extremists of all shapes and sizes were attracted to the Tea Party ranks—Christian religious fanatics, gun nuts, anti-gay bigots, nativists opposed to all nonwhite immigrants, secessionists, conspiracy theorists and, of course, racists.

What binds them together is hatred. Hatred of government, yes, but also hatred of liberals, minorities, homosexuals, non-fundamentalist Christians, environmentalists, feminists, and many other groups.

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/04/i-voted-for-trump-to-destroy-the-gop-commentary.html
 
its a wacko distortion of reality.

the democrats have moved far left and the the republican establishment has been enabling them

https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion...ratic-party/ZrxV7lJYHrvWxOjXItAuZJ/story.html

AS DEMOCRATS begin maneuvering for the 2016 presidential race, there isn’t one who would think of disparaging John F. Kennedy’s stature as a Democratic Party hero. Yet it’s a pretty safe bet that none would dream of running on Kennedy’s approach to government or embrace his political beliefs.

Today’s Democratic Party — the home of Barack Obama, John Kerry, and Al Gore — wouldn’t give the time of day to a candidate like JFK.
across-the-board, top-to-bottom reductions in personal and corporate tax rates, slashed tariffs to promote free trade, and even spoke out against the “confiscatory” property taxes being levied in too many cities.

He was anything but a big-spending, welfare-state liberal. “I do not believe that Washington should do for the people what they can do for themselves through local and private effort,” Kennedy bluntly avowed during the 1960 campaign. One of his first acts as president was to institute a pay cut for top White House staffers, and that was only the start of his budgetary austerity. “To the surprise of many of his appointees,” longtime aide Ted Sorensen would later write, he “personally scrutinized every agency request with a cold eye and encouraged his budget director to say ‘no.’ ”

On the other hand, he was a Cold War anticommunist who aggressively increased military spending. He faulted his Republican predecessor for tailoring the nation’s military strategy to fit the budget, rather than the other way around. “We must refuse to accept a cheap, second-best defense,” JFK said during his run for the White House. He made good on that pledge, pushing defense spending to 50 percent of federal expenditures and 9 percent of GDP, both far higher than today’s levels. Speaking in Texas just hours before his death, he proudly took credit for building the US military into “a defense system second to none.”

Since that terrible day in Dallas 50 years ago, popular mythology has turned Kennedy into a liberal hero. Some of that mythmaking, as journalist and historian Ira Stoll argues in a new book, “JFK, Conservative,” was driven by Kennedy aides, such as Sorensen and Arthur Schlesinger Jr., who had always wanted their boss to be more left-leaning than he was. Some of it was fueled by the Democratic Party’s emotional connection to the memory of a martyred president, and its understandable desire to link their priorities to his legacy.

But Kennedy was no liberal. By any reasonable definition, he was a conservative — and not just by the standards of our era, but by those of his era as well.

 
The only accurate statement in the OP is that the republican party needs to be blown up. We have a far left democrat party dominated by radicals, extremists and wackos. Rather than go through the list, let's just stipulate that Al Sharpton is a respected party figure and that any candidate for president must get his clearance. Yet the media are obsessed over some comment by David Duke, someone who has been irrelevant for 30 years.

The Tea Party was the only good thing to happen to the republicans since Reagan left office. Even though the Tea Party gave them two resounding congressional victories, all the party hacks could do was plot to undermine the Tea Party and marginalize its leaders.

Trump's popularity, and also Cruz's, is the result of that betrayal. Whatever happens in this election, the party in its current form is toast. Either Trump or Cruz cleans house or they screw us again and we abandon them in droves. Let them have their northeastern country club, midwestern liberal republican party. They'll be lucky to get 50 congressional seats.
 
you have turned into a fool nitro.
I suspect the owner of the site gave you the job of playing the leftist fool when he go rid of his previous content providers.

You do a better job... but you are still a fool.
You seem to be able to go one post and zero to 1 reply deep on any subject... and then you turn into a fraudcurrents type fool.

Too bad you didn't try to go deeper. You might have caused us all to have a useful debate. Now... you are not even worth engaging.

Is Jem Comical Ali?

 
you have turned into a fool nitro.
I suspect the owner of the site gave you the job of playing the leftist fool when he go rid of his previous content providers.

You do a better job... but you are still a fool.
You seem to be able to go one post and zero to 1 reply deep on any subject... and then you turn into a fraudcurrents type fool.

Too bad you didn't try to go deeper. You might have caused us all to have a useful debate. Now... you are not even worth engaging.

Good analysis...One shill leaves and a new one steps in to fill his shoes...I'm not the only one who found it remarkably suspicious how Free Thinker, AK47 and a host of others would literally post dozens of times a day on the same topics with the same replies...No debate, nothing more than cut and paste propaganda and snide remarks...

Nitro does seem to have been assigned to P&R...
 
you have turned into a fool nitro.
I suspect the owner of the site gave you the job of playing the leftist fool when he go rid of his previous content providers.

You do a better job... but you are still a fool.
You seem to be able to go one post and zero to 1 reply deep on any subject... and then you turn into a fraudcurrents type fool.

Too bad you didn't try to go deeper. You might have caused us all to have a useful debate. Now... you are not even worth engaging.

Gotta agree. Nitro's been rubbing a blister on me for a while which I've mostly ignored. Finally, and deservedly, he's ON IGNORE!
 
Back
Top