Sure he has jemFirst of all jem ceased posting here.
Sure he has jemFirst of all jem ceased posting here.
So wait now you wish to judge polls on whether they picked the winner as you said for years?
Or, are you saying the winner does not matter like you have been saying since all your favorite polls failed by that standard in 2016.
.
Second... we can only judge polls accurately when they reveal their samples and we see they conform to recent election turnouts.
Rasmussen is hiding their cross tab behind a platinum membership... so we don't know whether they are good poll or not right now.
Jem aka tjustice said Rasmussen was a jem honest poll
you are an idiot....
Polls change the standards have not.
Tjustice aka jem said Rasmussen was a jem honest poll.Is Rasmussen no longer an honest poll?If not why start a thread based on the results of a dishonest poll?
Once again you manifest the logic of your average democrat.
Not meeting the standard does mean a dishonest poll.
In this case it simply means we can't judge its honesty until we see the template.
More likely to reflect a change in public opinion rather than a change in polling methods or "template". Interestingly, if you average all the professional poll results using the last poll results reported just before the election, they were right on the money within the margin of error. The professional polls were amazingly accurate once again!
Of course not. It changed over the course of the campaign.Did public opinion remarkably change two days before the election.