i think it's shocking there are people that will disagree with this

[ARogueTrader]

Exactly what is not clear that appears as gibberish to you?

You do seem to require a lot of clarification of statements.

"I can't be covered ART, it's in the record."

Speaking of clarification, the above statement of yours makes no sense to me.

As far as fabrication, that would require intent to deceive, which is much different in concept than a mistake.

Quote from Turok:

Such gibberish to cover up for a fabrication. I can't be covered ART, it's in the record.

Of course, what else would we expect from ART(ist).

JB

 

[Turok]

>"I can't be covered ART, it's in the record."

Sorry ART. Clearly confusing. The "I" should be an "It".

Now the statement when read in context will make sense.

JB

PS. And I edited the "I" to an "It" in that post. Thanks for pointing it out.

 

[Turok]

ART:
>Exactly what is not clear that appears as gibberish to you?

It's exactly clear ART - - cleary gibberish that once again fails to address the false accusation.

I think he wants to look foolish.

I'll let him.

JB

 

[ARogueTrader]

Were you aware of the modified statement when you continued to use the first statement to make a point?

Quote from Turok:

ART:
>Exactly what is not clear that appears as gibberish to you?

It's exactly clear ART - - cleary gibberish that once again fails to address the false accusation.

I think he wants to look foolish.

I'll let him.

JB