i so disagree with what's going on here
- Thread starter Gordon Gekko
- Start date
these will be my final comments in this thread:
1) ruining ET? i've been on ET since before 2000. don't give me some ruining ET crap.
2) this is the issue here. the atkins diet thread has 559 replies. can anyone seriously say my post that was deleted twice was any worse than 90% of the other posts in that thread?!?! of course it wasn't. it should have been left alone. in many cases, deleting posts just causes more of a ruckus than if the posts were just left alone. if i type something and it gets edited/deleted, the moderator better have a damn good reason for doing so (unless it's Baron).
1) ruining ET? i've been on ET since before 2000. don't give me some ruining ET crap.
2) this is the issue here. the atkins diet thread has 559 replies. can anyone seriously say my post that was deleted twice was any worse than 90% of the other posts in that thread?!?! of course it wasn't. it should have been left alone. in many cases, deleting posts just causes more of a ruckus than if the posts were just left alone. if i type something and it gets edited/deleted, the moderator better have a damn good reason for doing so (unless it's Baron).
Gigi,
I don't know how you take yourself so seriously time and time again. It is no small feat and I congratulate you. I was unaware of the post of yours which had been deleted, but I believe dbp is correct is appraising your comments. The ruckus which is sometimes caused is caused by the subject of deletion. The ruckus is, from what I have seen, invariably as inundated with the same sort of nonsense as the deleted post(s) in question.
I am saddened that you have not accepted my acceptance of your brawling offer. I think we both could have learned something. I wish you the best in your befuddled existence.
Yours truly,
rlb
I don't know how you take yourself so seriously time and time again. It is no small feat and I congratulate you. I was unaware of the post of yours which had been deleted, but I believe dbp is correct is appraising your comments. The ruckus which is sometimes caused is caused by the subject of deletion. The ruckus is, from what I have seen, invariably as inundated with the same sort of nonsense as the deleted post(s) in question.
I am saddened that you have not accepted my acceptance of your brawling offer. I think we both could have learned something. I wish you the best in your befuddled existence.
Yours truly,
rlb
Gordon:
I like you and i don't want you to take this the wrong way , but PLEASE grow a Dick!!!!!!
Stop your whining !!!....EVERY time a post get's deleted or a thread gets closed, you and a few others run to this feedback section and act like this grave human injustice happened...YOU cause the ruckus by carrying on like this....When You and FPC were wrecking the atkins thread and had everyone complaining, did I start a thread about it??? NO....I sadi good bye to the thread until it returned to the subject at hand....but you get ONE post deleted and you would think you were denied a job based on your skin color......Calm the F*ck down and take it for what it is....a deleted post that had NO relevance to the subject of the thread......now that I said my peace, I 'd like to know when and where your are going to exchange fisticuffs with RLB
that's a bad argument. just because i complain it doesn't mean that i don't keep things in perspective. obviously if my post gets deleted on ET it's not like my whole day is ruined. however, relative to ET, getting your post deleted is still annoying, so if i think it's a problem, i'll complain about it.
yes, that's the point. people like me WILL cause a ruckus if our posts get edited/deleted and we don't think they should. knowing there are others like me who are going to cause a ruckus, the moderators might consider if it's really worth it to moderate the hell out of things.
