They are very scared of Trump or someone like him running in 2024. Furthermore, they are extremely worried about the 2022 midterms which Trump plans on being extremely involved in. ---The mere fact that Justice Roberts is not involved flies directly in the face of the argument that this is a constitutional process. --It's far from constitutional as it's written by The Founders that when The President is tried, The Chief Justice shall preside. Thus, by having the partisan Leahy in charge, they are admitting that Trump is not The President and thus cannot be removed or prevented from holding further office. ----From that then it follows that since Congreff cannot pass bills of attainder against private citizens, that this is an illegal process as well.
'I Said The Opposite': Criticism Of Trump's Impeachment Defense Intensifies
- Thread starter Frederick Foresight
- Start date
Sadly that was overlooked completely by the GOP but I thought it was included in the articles of impeachment (too lazy to look)
Except for one thing-----It wasn't. (he didn't ask the SOS to flip legal votes. He asked for the SOS to discount illegal votes)
Trump actually told them how many votes they'd find (250,000-300,000) where the signatures don't match, from Fulton County.
Now, how could he know how many signatures would not match? And from a particular county?
It's obvious what Trump was doing.
It's also obvious that you are, and were OK with it.
There's not a democratic bone in your body, komrade.
Here’s the full transcript and audio of the call between Trump and Raffensperger
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...68e0cc-4ddd-11eb-83e3-322644d82356_story.html
Illegal votes should not be counted in any election. This is what Trump supports. No one was asking for legal votes to not be counted. Nice try though.
You can repeat it as many times as you want.
it wasn't. The dems suck that way
And I will be right each time. Leftists are good at twisting words and gaslighting. ---That's what you do----