Quote from Ivanovich:
I'm suggesting to limit it to a single forum for several reasons:
1. The management of this site does not wish to upgrade the forum software to include the necessary tools able to accomplish what would be necessary to moderate site-wide proposed policy. This is just my guess.
2. I also don't believe that management desires to strong hand the entire forum, though my personal belief lies more in agreeing with you guys that it is necessary to maintain quality posts on this site.
3. Implementing tough moderation in one forum is possible with the moderators we have. Doing it site wide is impossible as it would require a 24/7 presence. And none of us get paid to do this. In other words, there are far too many forum clowns for the cops we have in service.
I would volunteer to heavily moderate the one forum of choice (Journals, Day Trading, whatever). Unless the majority of you believe that I would not be a good choice - then I would advise you to pick one who would.
Let me know if there is enough support for this, and I will submit the idea to Baron/Joe - or perhaps they will read this and post their thoughts.
While I would have no objections to heavy moderating from you or someone else, I think this would be a bandage with minimal 'bang for the buck' to address the issue. Allowing self moderating by the thread starter (in addition to the existing moderation) is the best solution IMO. However, it's Baron's site and he must weigh the costs of making site improvements with the risk of seeing his site content become increasingly worthless drivel.